온라인 선거규제의 쟁점과 한계: 공정성과 참여 가치 사이의 균열을 중심으로

This article relating to social media in terms of institution evaluation,voters regulations that restrict the free use of media as a “The Public Official Election Act” to the limitations of the analysis. This article started from 1996 online election regulations to revise the history of the 2012 The Public Official Election Act amendments and regulations of the Internet media, Internet Election News Deliberation Committee, the Limited Identification, Art and the avoidance of the issue reveals the rigidity in the regulatory to assess. Limited in December 2011 prior to a decision of unconstitutionality over the key regulatory issues and the process of forming the subject,duration, content, method restrictions inherent in the dominant discourse ensure fair evaluation of the Focus on the bias, while ensuring fairness of the “The Public Official Election Act” of the Although the purpose embodied the other hand, free expression and participation in the election to be made to encourage a culture have shown as the effect of limiting rather than to criticize. In addition, stricter regulations than ever appeared in 2011, reversing a prospective limited and most recently declared unconstitutional on the 29th of February 2012 made “The Public Official Election Act” amendments contained in a ball, is evaluated. Limitations of this reality and to limit application of the law, especially in the part of the problem than in the past by analyzing the allowable range of online campaigning, despite the wider development of the new media reality due to the revised law, rather than to improve past and repetition of the same issues may be faced with future system improvements and participation in the process need to reflect the principle of comprehensive claims.