애스크로AIPublic Preview
← 학술논문 검색
학술논문노동법학2012.06 발행KCI 피인용 5

단체협약 시정명령제도의 운용실태와 한계

A Review of the Administrative Order to Modify Unlawful Contents of Collective Bargaining Agreement

강선희(고려대학교)

42호, 35~72쪽

초록

「Trade Union and Labor Relations Adjustment Act」(TULRAA), section 31(3) provide that “an administrative agency can order to modify unlawful contents of collective agreement with the consent of Labor Relations Commission.”It means that labor authorities can supervise and interfere with collective agreements by labor and management. Furthermore, the Act imposes fines of up to 5 million for the order violations (Section 93 no.2)The administrative order, however, has considerable issues which could infringe the principle of industrial autonomy in the law of collective bargaining agreement. Then, the constitutionality of the sections is controversial lately. The courts held that the section 31(3) is constitutional but the section 93 no.2 could be unconstitutional. The judgment have been referred to the Constitutional Court of Korea and now we have expected the decision of the Court. This report reviews the history, meaning and limits of the administrative order in the aspect of the constitutionality. In conclusion, the administrative order could be easily misuse by labor authorities and should be repealed by a new legislation. If the order would have some preventive effects, as advocates of the sections have propounded it, the provision to prevent possible abuses of labor authorities's order should be prepared.

Abstract

「Trade Union and Labor Relations Adjustment Act」(TULRAA), section 31(3) provide that “an administrative agency can order to modify unlawful contents of collective agreement with the consent of Labor Relations Commission.”It means that labor authorities can supervise and interfere with collective agreements by labor and management. Furthermore, the Act imposes fines of up to 5 million for the order violations (Section 93 no.2)The administrative order, however, has considerable issues which could infringe the principle of industrial autonomy in the law of collective bargaining agreement. Then, the constitutionality of the sections is controversial lately. The courts held that the section 31(3) is constitutional but the section 93 no.2 could be unconstitutional. The judgment have been referred to the Constitutional Court of Korea and now we have expected the decision of the Court. This report reviews the history, meaning and limits of the administrative order in the aspect of the constitutionality. In conclusion, the administrative order could be easily misuse by labor authorities and should be repealed by a new legislation. If the order would have some preventive effects, as advocates of the sections have propounded it, the provision to prevent possible abuses of labor authorities's order should be prepared.

발행기관:
한국노동법학회
DOI:
http://dx.doi.org/
분류:
노동법

AI 법률 상담

이 논문의 주제에 대해 더 알고 싶으신가요?

460만+ 법률 자료에서 관련 판례·법령·해석례를 찾아 답변합니다

AI 상담 시작
단체협약 시정명령제도의 운용실태와 한계 | 노동법학 2012 | AskLaw | 애스크로 AI