애스크로AIPublic Preview
← 학술논문 검색
학술논문아주법학2012.06 발행KCI 피인용 3

기부채납 부담계약에 대한 쟁송방법

Litigation methods to the burden contract of the contributed acceptance

정해영(변호사)

6권 1호, 447~478쪽

초록

The contributed acceptance is usually added to a beneficial administrative act as the form of “Nebenbestimmung”. But it has increased to add it as the form of agreement or contract these days. The burden contract of contributed acceptance has a characteristic of substitute for the burden as administrative act. The main administrative act relating to the burden contract is based on public law. Therefore, it should be evaluated as a public contract and dealt accordingly. In the same line, a complainant should be conducted through “allgemeine Leistungsklage” or “Feststellungsklage” as party suit. If the party defaults on the burden contract, the adminstrative agency is able to file “allgemeine Leistungsklage”. If it is defective on the burden contract, either party is able to nullify the contract through “Feststellungsklage”. Even if the main administrative act is valid, the burden contact can be partially invalidated or terminated. At this point, the theory of “partial revocation of administrative act” can be analogically applied.

Abstract

The contributed acceptance is usually added to a beneficial administrative act as the form of “Nebenbestimmung”. But it has increased to add it as the form of agreement or contract these days. The burden contract of contributed acceptance has a characteristic of substitute for the burden as administrative act. The main administrative act relating to the burden contract is based on public law. Therefore, it should be evaluated as a public contract and dealt accordingly. In the same line, a complainant should be conducted through “allgemeine Leistungsklage” or “Feststellungsklage” as party suit. If the party defaults on the burden contract, the adminstrative agency is able to file “allgemeine Leistungsklage”. If it is defective on the burden contract, either party is able to nullify the contract through “Feststellungsklage”. Even if the main administrative act is valid, the burden contact can be partially invalidated or terminated. At this point, the theory of “partial revocation of administrative act” can be analogically applied.

발행기관:
법학연구소
DOI:
http://dx.doi.org/10.21589/ajlaw.2012.6.1.447
분류:
법학

AI 법률 상담

이 논문의 주제에 대해 더 알고 싶으신가요?

460만+ 법률 자료에서 관련 판례·법령·해석례를 찾아 답변합니다

AI 상담 시작
기부채납 부담계약에 대한 쟁송방법 | 아주법학 2012 | AskLaw | 애스크로 AI