회사지배구조 관련 판례와 학설의 불일치와 극복
A Study on the Differences between Korean Judicial Precedents and Academic Theories in the field of Corporate Governance
육태우(강원대학교)
25권 2호, 127~177쪽
초록
Korean corporate law made on the basis of the continental legal system has been revised being influenced by the American legal system in recent 10~15 years. It is the same with the Korean corporate governance system. This article deals with various issues in Korean corporate governance law related to the method of proxy solicitation, procedures of appointment of directors, the ground that a CEO can be paid for damage when he or she is dismissed, the subjective test of abuse of representative power, chances of expanding the concept of fiduciary duty, especially duty of loyalty, developed in Anglo-American trust law in Korean corporate law. methods of approval of directors’ self-dealing, remedies of shareholders’ consequential damage, possibilities of acknowledging double or multiple derivative suits.
Abstract
Korean corporate law made on the basis of the continental legal system has been revised being influenced by the American legal system in recent 10~15 years. It is the same with the Korean corporate governance system. This article deals with various issues in Korean corporate governance law related to the method of proxy solicitation, procedures of appointment of directors, the ground that a CEO can be paid for damage when he or she is dismissed, the subjective test of abuse of representative power, chances of expanding the concept of fiduciary duty, especially duty of loyalty, developed in Anglo-American trust law in Korean corporate law. methods of approval of directors’ self-dealing, remedies of shareholders’ consequential damage, possibilities of acknowledging double or multiple derivative suits.
- 발행기관:
- 한국상사판례학회
- DOI:
- http://dx.doi.org/
- 분류:
- 법학