피해자의 관점에서 유죄답변협상의 제한적 실현

In Korean Legal System, there is no legal negotiation in the criminal procedure. The Department of Justice pronounced the Criminal Procedure Code and Criminal Code amendment containing the plea bargaining on July 13, 2011. And this system has envisaged in the National Assembly. Through this system "Justice collaborators"who filed the charges, or penalties can be exempted. The debate has continued for a long time whether it is necessary to introduce the plea negotiation. There has been discussion about the introduction of americanized plea bargaining. Supporters have emphasized the processing of the investigation and efficiency. On the other hand,opponents have emphasized infringement of the right of the accused. But always the victim's presence in this debate have been excluded. In this article, the introduction of plea negotiations desirable and what is absolutely necessary to introduce any restrictions must be considered will review. The most important party to be considered is crime victim bringing the plea bargaining into our criminal justice system Negotiations have already "existed" and, for the processing of the case quickly the introduction of plea negotiations is desirable by considering the presence of the victim, so it is natural decision to introduce very "limitedly" in the case of victimless crimes and organized crime cases. New regulations in consultation with the victim should be introduced in the procedure. The limited negotiations should be conducted the criminal mediation should be utilized broadly. In short, the limited introduction of plea negotiations is necessary and victim should be considered. It is the duty of state and criminal law to protect the legal interests of citizens of the country.