정규직노조의 지원활동이 비정규직노조에 미치는 영향

As many labor scholars have suggested, the relations between a labor union covering regular employees and a labor union with irregular employees is a influential factor in the organizational performance of the union covering irregular employees. Some labor scholars have believed that if the labor union with regular employees would support the irregular employees’ union, it could have positive effectives for activities of the union in a workplace. This focus on how various tools and ways backed up by the labor union with regular employees affect the labor union covering irregular employees about collective activities. This employs the quantitative and qualitative method, which based on a survey targeting labor unions covering irregular employees and a case study on two the labor union in the metal industry. As the result of analysis, it is found out that the support of regular employees’ labor union can positively have the union effectiveness, substantive effects of the union, but have little effect on the potential bargaining power. This demonstrates that the support of labor unions covering regular employees could strength the irregular employee’s union, on the contrary, weaken it’s organizational power depends on the ways and tools taken by the regular employees’ union. A education program and organizational activity to organize irregular employees daily and supports during the labor disputes can have positive effect on the labor union with irregular employees for its organizational and bargaining power. However, the way of substitute bargaining for irregular employees and the grievance procedure for irregular employees excluding union activities from irregular employees would weaken the labor union with irregular employees. Because it can undermine the expectation of irregular employees to their own labor unions. Furthermore, in some cases, employers accepted the substitute bargaining with intentions to expel the labor unions covering irregular employees from their workplace, if there some political opinions between irregular employees’union and regular union. To conclude, in the collective activities of a labor union with irregular employees, the support of a labor union covering regular employees can be the deceive factor, but the organizational effect can be varied depends on the ways and tools of the support by the regular employees’union. It turns out that union education programs, and organizational activities are effective in ordinary times. And during labor disputes, more active ways of support can be important for the labor union with irregular workers. The the substitute bargaining would not contribute to encourage the bargaining and organizational power for the irregular workers’ union.