애스크로AIPublic Preview
← 학술논문 검색
학술논문원광법학2012.09 발행KCI 피인용 1

자백과 보강증거 - 판례를 중심으로 -

Confessions and Corroborating Evidence - Focused on Judicial Precedents -

김덕중(원광대학교)

28권 3호, 31~52쪽

초록

A judge cannot convict a defendant of guilty despite judge's belief in the guilt of the defendant based on the confession with admissibility of evidence and credible confession unless there is corroborating evidence. This is an exception to the principle of free evaluation of evidence restricting admissibility of evidence and originates from a need to prevent misjudgement and to protect human rights. On the other hand, as for the corroborating evidence, judicial precedents support the theory of veracity security "the degree of veracity ensuring the veracity of the confession" in respect of the issue 'how much the corroborating evidence shall corroborate the confession. However, its standard is so abstract that the supplement to this is required.

Abstract

A judge cannot convict a defendant of guilty despite judge's belief in the guilt of the defendant based on the confession with admissibility of evidence and credible confession unless there is corroborating evidence. This is an exception to the principle of free evaluation of evidence restricting admissibility of evidence and originates from a need to prevent misjudgement and to protect human rights. On the other hand, as for the corroborating evidence, judicial precedents support the theory of veracity security "the degree of veracity ensuring the veracity of the confession" in respect of the issue 'how much the corroborating evidence shall corroborate the confession. However, its standard is so abstract that the supplement to this is required.

발행기관:
법학연구소
분류:
기타법학

AI 법률 상담

이 논문의 주제에 대해 더 알고 싶으신가요?

460만+ 법률 자료에서 관련 판례·법령·해석례를 찾아 답변합니다

AI 상담 시작
자백과 보강증거 - 판례를 중심으로 - | 원광법학 2012 | AskLaw | 애스크로 AI