애스크로AIPublic Preview
← 학술논문 검색
학술논문민사법학2012.10 발행KCI 피인용 13

압류와 상계 - 대판(전) 2012.2.16, 2011다45521 [공2012상, 444] -

Attachment and Set-Off

김상수(서강대학교)

60권, 273~313쪽

초록

.This case study analyzes judgment of the Grand Bench of the Supreme Court about attachment and set-off. There are many places suggested in that the judgment was deeply argued for the first time about attachment and set-off. The point of argument was not discussed so much by academic circles. However, attachment and set-off became a problem mostly in the financial transaction, and there were not few judicial precedents about it. Therefore, it is expected that many arguments will start about attachment and set-off by judgment in this case from now on. This study advances an argument from the following contents. That is,the related judicial precedent of the Supreme Court is arranged to the beginning. The judicial precedent of Japanese Supreme Court which affected the judicial precedent of the Supreme Court the second is taken up. The theory of Japanese and the theory of our country about point of argument of this study are touched the third. A personal opinion is expressed to the last about the meaning of this judgment.

Abstract

.This case study analyzes judgment of the Grand Bench of the Supreme Court about attachment and set-off. There are many places suggested in that the judgment was deeply argued for the first time about attachment and set-off. The point of argument was not discussed so much by academic circles. However, attachment and set-off became a problem mostly in the financial transaction, and there were not few judicial precedents about it. Therefore, it is expected that many arguments will start about attachment and set-off by judgment in this case from now on. This study advances an argument from the following contents. That is,the related judicial precedent of the Supreme Court is arranged to the beginning. The judicial precedent of Japanese Supreme Court which affected the judicial precedent of the Supreme Court the second is taken up. The theory of Japanese and the theory of our country about point of argument of this study are touched the third. A personal opinion is expressed to the last about the meaning of this judgment.

발행기관:
한국민사법학회
분류:
법학

AI 법률 상담

이 논문의 주제에 대해 더 알고 싶으신가요?

460만+ 법률 자료에서 관련 판례·법령·해석례를 찾아 답변합니다

AI 상담 시작
압류와 상계 - 대판(전) 2012.2.16, 2011다45521 [공2012상, 444] - | 민사법학 2012 | AskLaw | 애스크로 AI