국제투자협정상 공정하고 공평한 대우에 관한 연구
A Study on Fair and Equitable Treatment in International Investment Agreements
김용일(한국교통대학교); 홍성규(한국교통대학교)
22권 3호, 187~213쪽
초록
우리나라가 체결한 대다수의 양자간투자협정(BIT) 및 FTA 투자챕터에는 외국투자자(투자)를 보호하기 위하여 공정하고 공평한 대우(Fair and Equitable Treatment), 최소기준 대우(Minimum Standard of Treatment), 내국민 대우(National Treatment), 최혜국 대우(Most-Favoured-National Treatment), 포괄적 보호조항(Umbrella Clause) 등을 규정하고 있다. 이러한 원칙들 가운데 FET는 “각 당사국은 항상 타방 당사국의 국민과 기업 및 그들의 재산, 사업, 기타 이익에 대하여 공정하고 공평하게 대우”해야 하는 조항으로, 그동안 중재판정부가 투자자 보호원칙으로서 그 위반을 인정한 기준으로 가장 많이 인용한 원칙이다. 본고에서는 지금까지 중재판정부가 FET 원칙을 적용함에 있어서 구체적으로 어떤 적용기준을 근거로 판정을 내렸는지에 관하여 검토하는바, 결과적으로 투명성 및 투자자의 적합한 기대의 보호, 계약상의 의무 준수, 적법절차와 사법거부, 신의성실, 강압으로 부터의 자유 등 5가지 기준을 사례의 분석과 함께 제시하였다. 동 연구는 실무당사자들에게 투자분쟁발생시 자신들이 유의할 점이 무엇인지, 투자계약의 체결부터 종료에 이르기까지 어떻게 대처해야 하는지에 대해 유용한 정보를 줄 것으로 생각한다.
Abstract
The purpose of this article is to examine Fair and Equitable Treatment in International Investment Agreements. Most BITs and other investment treaties provide for FET of foreign investments. Today, this concept is the most frequently invoked standard in investment disputes. It is also the standard with the highest practical relevance: a majority of successful claims pursued in international arbitration are based on a violation of the FET standard. The concept of FET is not new but has appeared in international documents for some time. Some of these documents were nonbinding others entered into force as multilateral or bilateral treaties. Considerable debate has surrounded the question of whether the FET standard merely reflects the internationalminimum standard, as contained in customary international law, or offers an autonomous standard that is additional to general international law. As a matter of textual interpretation, it seems implausible that a treaty would refer to a well-known concept like the "minimum standard of treatment in customary international law" by using the expression "fair and equitable treatment."Broad definitions or descriptions are not the only way to gauge the meaning of an elusive concept such as FET. Another method is to identify typical factual situations to which this principle has been applied. An examination of the practice of tribunals demonstrates that several principles can be identified that are embraced by the standard of fair and equitable treatment. Some of the cases discussed clearly speak to the central roles of transparency, stability, and the investor's legitimate expectations in the current understanding of the FET standard. Other contexts in which the standard has been applied concern compliance with contractual obligations, procedural propriety and due process, action in good faith, and freedom from coercion and harassment. In short, meeting the investor's central legitimate concern of legal consistency, stability, and predictability remains a major, but not the only, ingredient of an investment-friendly climate in which the host state in turn can reasonably expect to attract foreign investment.
- 발행기관:
- 한국중재학회
- 분류:
- 무역학