애스크로AIPublic Preview
← 학술논문 검색
학술논문Annals of Laboratory Medicine2013.03 발행

Comparison of 3 Automated Immunoassays for Detection of Anti-Hepatitis A Virus Immunoglobulin M in a Tertiary Care Hospital

Comparison of 3 Automated Immunoassays for Detection of Anti-Hepatitis A Virus Immunoglobulin M in a Tertiary Care Hospital

박혜원(서울대학교); 이유주(서울대학교); 성문우(서울대학교병원); 이도훈(국립암센터); 박명희(서울대학교); 송은영(서울대학교)

33권 2호, 121~124쪽

초록

Three automated immunoassay kits for anti-Hepatitis A Virus (HAV) IgM−Architect, (Abbott Laboratories, USA), Elecsys (Roche Diagnostics, Germany), and ADVIA Centaur (Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics Inc., USA)−were compared. We included 178 consecutive samples, for which an anti-HAV IgM test was requested at Seoul National University Hospital from September 2009 to January 2010. Reviewing of medical records, reverse transcription (RT)-PCR for HAV RNA, or total anti-HAV assay were performed on 16 (9.0%)samples with discrepant results. The percent agreements (kappas) of the Architect and ADVIA Centaur, Architect and Elecsys, and ADVIA Centaur and Elecsys kits were 96.6%(0.91), 96.6% (0.92), and 97.8% (0.94), respectively. Eight out of 16 discrepant samples showed gray-zone values in Architect but were nonreactive in the others. Slightly earlier seroconversion was suspected in Elecsys. The 3 assays showed comparable performances with excellent agreements in a tertiary care hospital setting.

Abstract

Three automated immunoassay kits for anti-Hepatitis A Virus (HAV) IgM−Architect, (Abbott Laboratories, USA), Elecsys (Roche Diagnostics, Germany), and ADVIA Centaur (Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics Inc., USA)−were compared. We included 178 consecutive samples, for which an anti-HAV IgM test was requested at Seoul National University Hospital from September 2009 to January 2010. Reviewing of medical records, reverse transcription (RT)-PCR for HAV RNA, or total anti-HAV assay were performed on 16 (9.0%)samples with discrepant results. The percent agreements (kappas) of the Architect and ADVIA Centaur, Architect and Elecsys, and ADVIA Centaur and Elecsys kits were 96.6%(0.91), 96.6% (0.92), and 97.8% (0.94), respectively. Eight out of 16 discrepant samples showed gray-zone values in Architect but were nonreactive in the others. Slightly earlier seroconversion was suspected in Elecsys. The 3 assays showed comparable performances with excellent agreements in a tertiary care hospital setting.

발행기관:
대한진단검사의학회
분류:
병리학

AI 법률 상담

이 논문의 주제에 대해 더 알고 싶으신가요?

460만+ 법률 자료에서 관련 판례·법령·해석례를 찾아 답변합니다

AI 상담 시작
Comparison of 3 Automated Immunoassays for Detection of Anti-Hepatitis A Virus Immunoglobulin M in a Tertiary Care Hospital | Annals of Laboratory Medicine 2013 | AskLaw | 애스크로 AI