애스크로AIPublic Preview
← 학술논문 검색
학술논문원광법학2013.03 발행KCI 피인용 7

계약명의신탁과 부당이득반환청구권 - 판례를 중심으로 -

Contract Title Trust and Right of Claiming Unjust Enrichment Restitution - Focused on Judicial Precedents -

김덕중(원광대학교)

29권 1호, 87~113쪽

초록

The contract title trust is a type of title trust where the title trustee make a contract with a seller as a party of sales contract and register (the property) under the name of the title trustee the after the title truster and the title trustee make a purchase entrustment contract. The title truster can retain the ownership of the real estate only when the title trustee does not know the fact the seller made a title trust in accordance with laws. In this case, the title truster retains the right to claim the unjust enrichment restitution to the title trustee. According to the related laws, when the title trust contract was made before the enforcement of the related laws, the “real estate” itself is subject to the claim on the unjust enrichment restitution. Meanwhile since this right to claim the unjust enrichment restitution is receivables, it is subject to the extinctive prescription and the extinctive prescription continues even if the title truster possesses the applicable real estate.

Abstract

The contract title trust is a type of title trust where the title trustee make a contract with a seller as a party of sales contract and register (the property) under the name of the title trustee the after the title truster and the title trustee make a purchase entrustment contract. The title truster can retain the ownership of the real estate only when the title trustee does not know the fact the seller made a title trust in accordance with laws. In this case, the title truster retains the right to claim the unjust enrichment restitution to the title trustee. According to the related laws, when the title trust contract was made before the enforcement of the related laws, the “real estate” itself is subject to the claim on the unjust enrichment restitution. Meanwhile since this right to claim the unjust enrichment restitution is receivables, it is subject to the extinctive prescription and the extinctive prescription continues even if the title truster possesses the applicable real estate.

발행기관:
법학연구소
분류:
기타법학

AI 법률 상담

이 논문의 주제에 대해 더 알고 싶으신가요?

460만+ 법률 자료에서 관련 판례·법령·해석례를 찾아 답변합니다

AI 상담 시작
계약명의신탁과 부당이득반환청구권 - 판례를 중심으로 - | 원광법학 2013 | AskLaw | 애스크로 AI