A Study on Preclusion Rule in Letter of Credit Operations
A Study on Preclusion Rule in Letter of Credit Operations
한기문(한남대학교); 박세운(창원대학교)
14권 1호, 94~117쪽
초록
According to UCP600, an issuing bank has a maximum of five banking days following the banking day of presentation to determine whether the presentation is complying. If the issuing bank, decides to refuse to honour, it must give the presenter a single notice stating that it is refusing to honour, and identify all the discrepancies, by expeditious means. UCP600 faces a challenge because UCC Article 5 tells that a reasonable time for examination can expire before the deadline. An issuing bank that fails to give timely and complete notice to presenter of refusal to honour is strictly precluded from claiming that the presentation had been non-complying. Therefore a Korean issuing bank especially dealing with a beneficiary in USA shall be cautious in refusal notice procedure especially in case ISP98 is adapted as a governing rule or USA is employed as a jurisdiction.
Abstract
According to UCP600, an issuing bank has a maximum of five banking days following the banking day of presentation to determine whether the presentation is complying. If the issuing bank, decides to refuse to honour, it must give the presenter a single notice stating that it is refusing to honour, and identify all the discrepancies, by expeditious means. UCP600 faces a challenge because UCC Article 5 tells that a reasonable time for examination can expire before the deadline. An issuing bank that fails to give timely and complete notice to presenter of refusal to honour is strictly precluded from claiming that the presentation had been non-complying. Therefore a Korean issuing bank especially dealing with a beneficiary in USA shall be cautious in refusal notice procedure especially in case ISP98 is adapted as a governing rule or USA is employed as a jurisdiction.
- 발행기관:
- 한국무역보험학회
- 분류:
- 무역보험및서비스무역