애스크로AIPublic Preview
← 학술논문 검색
학술논문민사소송2013.05 발행KCI 피인용 6

가사심판의 효력에 관한 연구

김연(경북대학교)

17권 1호, 177~208쪽

초록

The Domestic Litigation Act of Korea provides that the final judgment of the first instance on a family non-litigation case shall be rendered by adjudication in the article 39 paragraph 1. This provision applies to all of the following two kinds of procedure in non-litigious domestic cases: one is family non-litigation case of category D(라) which has rare disputes, and the other is category E(마) which is to solve disputes between both parties. However, paragraph 4 of the same article provides that the provisions concerning decisions under the Civil Procedure Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to adjudications. Is that mean that adjudication is the same as the decision?I do not think that adjudication is exactly the same as decision. Then,how can I understand the effect of adjudication? In this paper, I tried to understand the effect of adjudication of non-litigious domestic case: First,does the adjudication has binding force to the court? Second, can you say that the adjudication shall be fixed generally? Third, does the adjudication has res judicata? Fourth as the last, how can I understand the constitutive power and executory power of adjudication?As the answers of the above question and conclusion, I suggested that the existing opinions are to be changed according to the purpose and characteristics of the non-litigious domestic cases.

Abstract

The Domestic Litigation Act of Korea provides that the final judgment of the first instance on a family non-litigation case shall be rendered by adjudication in the article 39 paragraph 1. This provision applies to all of the following two kinds of procedure in non-litigious domestic cases: one is family non-litigation case of category D(라) which has rare disputes, and the other is category E(마) which is to solve disputes between both parties. However, paragraph 4 of the same article provides that the provisions concerning decisions under the Civil Procedure Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to adjudications. Is that mean that adjudication is the same as the decision?I do not think that adjudication is exactly the same as decision. Then,how can I understand the effect of adjudication? In this paper, I tried to understand the effect of adjudication of non-litigious domestic case: First,does the adjudication has binding force to the court? Second, can you say that the adjudication shall be fixed generally? Third, does the adjudication has res judicata? Fourth as the last, how can I understand the constitutive power and executory power of adjudication?As the answers of the above question and conclusion, I suggested that the existing opinions are to be changed according to the purpose and characteristics of the non-litigious domestic cases.

발행기관:
한국민사소송법학회
분류:
법학

AI 법률 상담

이 논문의 주제에 대해 더 알고 싶으신가요?

460만+ 법률 자료에서 관련 판례·법령·해석례를 찾아 답변합니다

AI 상담 시작
가사심판의 효력에 관한 연구 | 민사소송 2013 | AskLaw | 애스크로 AI