애스크로AIPublic Preview
← 학술논문 검색
학술논문동북아법연구2013.05 발행KCI 피인용 1

韩中行政诉讼法上的原告适格之比较-以实证法解释与原告适格的范围为中心-

한국과 중국의 행정소송법상 원고적격-실정법의 해석과 원고적격의 범위를 중심으로- (The Standing to sue in Administrative Litigation Act of Korea and China)

정연부(원광대학교)

7권 1호, 87~104쪽

초록

Administrative action depends on governmental power and it is closely connected to the living of people. Therefore it has possibility of infringing on people's rights. If someone was infringed by administrative action, he or she could get relief from administrative litigation. Administrative litigation starts with a person filing a suit insisting whose right was infringed. However, administrative litigation also has an effect of securing the legality of administrative action. Even though securing the legality of administrative action is more related to promoting public interest, it is still needed for a person to fille a suit. Otherwise, the court could not begin to hear a case. A person whose right was infringed by administrative action files a suit, it is then that the court could judge on the illegality of administrative action. One of preconditions for the court to judge on the illegality of administrative action is the legality of a suit from the complainant. There are some main prerequisites for deciding whether the suit is legal or not. For example: the object in administrative litigation, the standing to sue, the standing to be sued, the interest of right protection. This study analyzed the standing to sue in Korea and China among these prerequisites above. Now, the new proposal is being reviewed after the bill was abrogated automatically, which had regulated to extend the scope of the standing to sue, passing the period of the 18th National Assembly in Korea. The debate on extending the scope of the standing to sue has been going on in China as well as in Korea. This study compared the standing to sue of Korea and China based on these facts.

Abstract

Administrative action depends on governmental power and it is closely connected to the living of people. Therefore it has possibility of infringing on people's rights. If someone was infringed by administrative action, he or she could get relief from administrative litigation. Administrative litigation starts with a person filing a suit insisting whose right was infringed. However, administrative litigation also has an effect of securing the legality of administrative action. Even though securing the legality of administrative action is more related to promoting public interest, it is still needed for a person to fille a suit. Otherwise, the court could not begin to hear a case. A person whose right was infringed by administrative action files a suit, it is then that the court could judge on the illegality of administrative action. One of preconditions for the court to judge on the illegality of administrative action is the legality of a suit from the complainant. There are some main prerequisites for deciding whether the suit is legal or not. For example: the object in administrative litigation, the standing to sue, the standing to be sued, the interest of right protection. This study analyzed the standing to sue in Korea and China among these prerequisites above. Now, the new proposal is being reviewed after the bill was abrogated automatically, which had regulated to extend the scope of the standing to sue, passing the period of the 18th National Assembly in Korea. The debate on extending the scope of the standing to sue has been going on in China as well as in Korea. This study compared the standing to sue of Korea and China based on these facts.

발행기관:
동북아법연구소
분류:
비교법학

AI 법률 상담

이 논문의 주제에 대해 더 알고 싶으신가요?

460만+ 법률 자료에서 관련 판례·법령·해석례를 찾아 답변합니다

AI 상담 시작
韩中行政诉讼法上的原告适格之比较-以实证法解释与原告适格的范围为中心- | 동북아법연구 2013 | AskLaw | 애스크로 AI