애스크로AIPublic Preview
← 학술논문 검색
학술논문민사법학2013.06 발행KCI 피인용 6

民法 제759조의 改正 論議에 관한 小考

Proposal on Revision of the Article 759 of the Civil Code

이연갑(연세대학교)

63권 1호, 235~260쪽

초록

Korean Civil Code Article 759 provides the liability for the harm causedby the animals. As the number of domestic animals increase, this Articlewill be used more often in the near future. In this paper, the authorsuggests the revision of this Article to make it more useful to thechanging circumstances. Scholars say that this liability is a kind of intermediate liability, whichlies between the fault-based liability and no fault liability. However, thearticle itself allows the possessor/keeper escape the liability by provingthat she exercised the requisite care in supervising the animal. Liability foranimal is a kind of risk-based liability due to the animal’s danger to thecommunity. Therefore, the author suggests that the Code should berevised as a strict liability. The author’s second suggestion is about theperson whose liability is sought. Article 759 provides the possessor and/orthe keeper as the libility holder. However, the “possessor” is not a properconcept for the risk-based liability in which the liability usually falls onwho controls the risk and benefits from keeping it. Therefore, the“keeper” is more appropriate liability holder in this Article. Third, theauthor proposes that the new Article should provide a force majeuredefense to avoid the controvercy whether the keeper could use thisdefense.

Abstract

Korean Civil Code Article 759 provides the liability for the harm causedby the animals. As the number of domestic animals increase, this Articlewill be used more often in the near future. In this paper, the authorsuggests the revision of this Article to make it more useful to thechanging circumstances. Scholars say that this liability is a kind of intermediate liability, whichlies between the fault-based liability and no fault liability. However, thearticle itself allows the possessor/keeper escape the liability by provingthat she exercised the requisite care in supervising the animal. Liability foranimal is a kind of risk-based liability due to the animal’s danger to thecommunity. Therefore, the author suggests that the Code should berevised as a strict liability. The author’s second suggestion is about theperson whose liability is sought. Article 759 provides the possessor and/orthe keeper as the libility holder. However, the “possessor” is not a properconcept for the risk-based liability in which the liability usually falls onwho controls the risk and benefits from keeping it. Therefore, the“keeper” is more appropriate liability holder in this Article. Third, theauthor proposes that the new Article should provide a force majeuredefense to avoid the controvercy whether the keeper could use thisdefense.

발행기관:
한국민사법학회
분류:
법학

AI 법률 상담

이 논문의 주제에 대해 더 알고 싶으신가요?

460만+ 법률 자료에서 관련 판례·법령·해석례를 찾아 답변합니다

AI 상담 시작
民法 제759조의 改正 論議에 관한 小考 | 민사법학 2013 | AskLaw | 애스크로 AI