기관평가지표 및 외형적 특성이 연구기관평가 결과 수용성에 미치는 영향

The importance of institution evaluations and the needs for change of perception on such evaluations are also the case of the research institutions affiliated to the National Research Council for Economic Humanities and Social Sciences. Such circumstances are differences in functions of 23 institutions, difficulties in research performance evaluation as research tends to be long-term and intricate to evaluate, and reluctance to non-financial aspects and lack of perception. In order to analyze the influences of BSC evaluation indicators on the evaluation results acceptance of institutions, external characteristics and the institution evaluation results were additionally selected as control variables. The study results can be summarized as follows. First of all, the results shows that the BSC evaluation indicators has positive influences upon the evaluation results acceptance of institutions. Secondly, the external characteristics has positive influences as well. External characteristics such as history, size, inspection results, director of institutions are in alignment with the evaluation acceptance. Third, it is shown that the other control factors consists of research/business management evaluation results and demographics do not affect the evaluation results acceptance. Fundamentally, any further research should focus on the appropriate BSC evaluation model particularly for research institutions. Specifically, deriving the relations between and among the factors of performance measurements will enable long-term development of institutions by providing them relevant information based on scientific and systematic measurement, and ultimately, contribute to management performance enhancement.