IPO vs. Back-door-listing : Which is a Better Signal?
IPO vs. Back-door-listing : Which is a Better Signal?
이선애(서울여자대학교)
26권 8호, 2113~2125쪽
초록
How a firm goes public and trades its stock in the market is an important issue in corporate finance. Although numerous prior studies investigate the initial public offering (IPO), not many studies paid attention to back-door-listing(BDL). In a signaling game model, both IPO and BDL are the actions that a firm can take for going public. Investors do not know the quality of the firm (a good or a bad type) and can only observe its action (IPO or BDL) as a message. Under this information asymmetry, we find equilibrium strategy of the firm. Interestingly, the results show that as the type revelation ability of BDL strengthens, both a good type and a bad type firm are likely to take the BDL strategy in equilibrium. It means that BDLs with proper systematic complements help good unlisted firms access the external capital market. This paper provides a theoretical basis for the positive aspect of BDL.
Abstract
How a firm goes public and trades its stock in the market is an important issue in corporate finance. Although numerous prior studies investigate the initial public offering (IPO), not many studies paid attention to back-door-listing(BDL). In a signaling game model, both IPO and BDL are the actions that a firm can take for going public. Investors do not know the quality of the firm (a good or a bad type) and can only observe its action (IPO or BDL) as a message. Under this information asymmetry, we find equilibrium strategy of the firm. Interestingly, the results show that as the type revelation ability of BDL strengthens, both a good type and a bad type firm are likely to take the BDL strategy in equilibrium. It means that BDLs with proper systematic complements help good unlisted firms access the external capital market. This paper provides a theoretical basis for the positive aspect of BDL.
- 발행기관:
- 대한경영학회
- 분류:
- 경영학