애스크로AIPublic Preview
← 학술논문 검색
학술논문성균관법학2013.09 발행KCI 피인용 2

우리나라의 MDP 도입방안에 관한 연구

A Study on MDP in Korea

이전오(성균관대학교)

25권 3호, 203~228쪽

초록

Multi-disciplinary Practice(hereinafter MDP) refers to the practice of lawyers and nonlegal professionals engaging in a business partnership. The approval of MDP and its extent differs in each country, depending on factors such as the country’s legal system, lawyer system, and legal environment. Countries that disapprove MDP are the United States and Japan. Countries that approve MDP are England, Germany, and Australia. The need and call for an one-stop service from the market will likely increase more and more, consequently resulting in the global trend of MDP’s approval. At this point, Korea should immediately launch studies and discussions on MDP to come up with a ‘Korean MDP’ and systemize the practice. Not only would this be a means to provide the people a service that well suits the changing phases of time, but it would also be an opportunity to expand Korea’s legal market as well as increase the country’s legal competitiveness. If Korea adopts MDP, I suggest the followings. First, discussions in Korea on MDP should be mainly focused on business partnership between lawyers and paralegals. Second, MDP form should be allowed only to law firms. Third, non-lawyers can be partner of MDP. However, lawyer should have interests more than 50 % of the MDP. Fourth, articles for form change from the current law firm to MDP is needed. Fifth, Ministry of Justice should be the licensing authorities for MDP. Sixth, discipline of non-lawyer specialists of MDP may be done by other laws that control the non-lawyer specialists.

Abstract

Multi-disciplinary Practice(hereinafter MDP) refers to the practice of lawyers and nonlegal professionals engaging in a business partnership. The approval of MDP and its extent differs in each country, depending on factors such as the country’s legal system, lawyer system, and legal environment. Countries that disapprove MDP are the United States and Japan. Countries that approve MDP are England, Germany, and Australia. The need and call for an one-stop service from the market will likely increase more and more, consequently resulting in the global trend of MDP’s approval. At this point, Korea should immediately launch studies and discussions on MDP to come up with a ‘Korean MDP’ and systemize the practice. Not only would this be a means to provide the people a service that well suits the changing phases of time, but it would also be an opportunity to expand Korea’s legal market as well as increase the country’s legal competitiveness. If Korea adopts MDP, I suggest the followings. First, discussions in Korea on MDP should be mainly focused on business partnership between lawyers and paralegals. Second, MDP form should be allowed only to law firms. Third, non-lawyers can be partner of MDP. However, lawyer should have interests more than 50 % of the MDP. Fourth, articles for form change from the current law firm to MDP is needed. Fifth, Ministry of Justice should be the licensing authorities for MDP. Sixth, discipline of non-lawyer specialists of MDP may be done by other laws that control the non-lawyer specialists.

발행기관:
법학연구원
DOI:
http://dx.doi.org/10.17008/skklr.2013.25.3.009
분류:
법학

AI 법률 상담

이 논문의 주제에 대해 더 알고 싶으신가요?

460만+ 법률 자료에서 관련 판례·법령·해석례를 찾아 답변합니다

AI 상담 시작
우리나라의 MDP 도입방안에 관한 연구 | 성균관법학 2013 | AskLaw | 애스크로 AI