애스크로AIPublic Preview
← 학술논문 검색
학술논문성균관법학2013.09 발행KCI 피인용 2

주지관용기술을 적용한 발명의 진보성 판단

Determination of Inventive Step of an Invention Applying Common General Knowledge

정차호(성균관대학교)

25권 3호, 265~289쪽

초록

This paper, after analyzing theories of the U.S.A., Europe and the Republic of Korea, defines well-known knowledge or common general knowledge as a technology generally known and accepted without question to the skilled person in the relevant art. Generally, a knowledge described in several textbooks could be accepted as a common general knowledge. However, a knowledge described in one or a few patent specifications hardly be accepted as common general knowledge. A knowledge which was generally known and accepted without question even to laypersons can be introduced without a proving evidence. Even over contrary contentions, the Examiner can decide based on the common general knowledge. Furthermore, a knowledge which was generally known and accepted without question to the skilled person in the art can be introduced without a proving evidence. However, in this instance, if there is a contrary contention, the person who rely on the common general knowledge shall introduce a supporting evidence, regardless whether the procedure is before the Patent Office, the Board or the Court.

Abstract

This paper, after analyzing theories of the U.S.A., Europe and the Republic of Korea, defines well-known knowledge or common general knowledge as a technology generally known and accepted without question to the skilled person in the relevant art. Generally, a knowledge described in several textbooks could be accepted as a common general knowledge. However, a knowledge described in one or a few patent specifications hardly be accepted as common general knowledge. A knowledge which was generally known and accepted without question even to laypersons can be introduced without a proving evidence. Even over contrary contentions, the Examiner can decide based on the common general knowledge. Furthermore, a knowledge which was generally known and accepted without question to the skilled person in the art can be introduced without a proving evidence. However, in this instance, if there is a contrary contention, the person who rely on the common general knowledge shall introduce a supporting evidence, regardless whether the procedure is before the Patent Office, the Board or the Court.

발행기관:
법학연구원
DOI:
http://dx.doi.org/10.17008/skklr.2013.25.3.011
분류:
법학

AI 법률 상담

이 논문의 주제에 대해 더 알고 싶으신가요?

460만+ 법률 자료에서 관련 판례·법령·해석례를 찾아 답변합니다

AI 상담 시작
주지관용기술을 적용한 발명의 진보성 판단 | 성균관법학 2013 | AskLaw | 애스크로 AI