애스크로AIPublic Preview
← 학술논문 검색
학술논문컴퓨터게임및콘텐츠논문지2013.09 발행KCI 피인용 9

게임물 이용금액 제한의 법률 문제

The Study on the Limitation of Accout in Game

김윤명(경희대학교)

26권 3호, 145~154쪽

초록

We advocate the principles of the Constitution and is a nation of culture. As a result, all the people have the right to enjoy culture has been granted freely and equally. This is in the form of cultural autonomy that would guarantee. To deny this, to deny the constitutional values t h at have no difference. In the game, however, at least two of these values i s being denied is self-evident. Then look at the game time does the two became popularly? Regulatory policies on these questions about the game and the reason that it will view. The origin of game regulations that will, among other things, Game Rating Classification. But never the meaning of the classification system is not negative. In other words, Game software for the hearing to proceed in the process of classification for a substantial review of the Game software through a variety of information, and the information provided to users of this role is because available at the time of classification issued by account per social security number and billing information is available about the limit. Payment limit based on the game that you can find in the law in the sense that beyond the limits of delegated legislation, including criticism that is raised. Game software is also limited by the other cultural industries, cultural content related laws do not exist in the culture of regulation by the government thinks is good example. Culture of our country which professes national constitutional principles Game software for the typical culture in value can be regulated for the payment limit will be discussed.

Abstract

We advocate the principles of the Constitution and is a nation of culture. As a result, all the people have the right to enjoy culture has been granted freely and equally. This is in the form of cultural autonomy that would guarantee. To deny this, to deny the constitutional values t h at have no difference. In the game, however, at least two of these values i s being denied is self-evident. Then look at the game time does the two became popularly? Regulatory policies on these questions about the game and the reason that it will view. The origin of game regulations that will, among other things, Game Rating Classification. But never the meaning of the classification system is not negative. In other words, Game software for the hearing to proceed in the process of classification for a substantial review of the Game software through a variety of information, and the information provided to users of this role is because available at the time of classification issued by account per social security number and billing information is available about the limit. Payment limit based on the game that you can find in the law in the sense that beyond the limits of delegated legislation, including criticism that is raised. Game software is also limited by the other cultural industries, cultural content related laws do not exist in the culture of regulation by the government thinks is good example. Culture of our country which professes national constitutional principles Game software for the typical culture in value can be regulated for the payment limit will be discussed.

발행기관:
(사)한국컴퓨터게임학회
DOI:
http://dx.doi.org/10.22819/kscg.2013.26.3.018
분류:
기타공학일반

AI 법률 상담

이 논문의 주제에 대해 더 알고 싶으신가요?

460만+ 법률 자료에서 관련 판례·법령·해석례를 찾아 답변합니다

AI 상담 시작
게임물 이용금액 제한의 법률 문제 | 컴퓨터게임및콘텐츠논문지 2013 | AskLaw | 애스크로 AI