영업손익 공시변경이 가치관련성에 미치는 영향
The Effect of the Revision of Operating Income Disclosure on Value Relevance
김용식(한성대학교); 조상민(부천대학교)
53호, 83~106쪽
초록
본 연구는 K-IFRS를 도입한 이후에 기업이 자율적으로 판단한 영업손익과 회계기준에서 규정한 표준화된 영업손익 중 어떠한 것이 더 가치적절한지 분석하였다. 이를 위해 제1001호 ‘재무제표 표시’를 개정하기 전인 2011년에 기업이 자율적으로 판단한 영업손익과 2012년에 제1001호 ‘재무제표 표시’를 개정하여 K-GAAP처럼 회계기준에 따라 산출한 영업손익을 이용하여 가치관련성을 비교․분석하였다. 영업손익 공시변경 전․후 가치관련성에 차이가 있는지 확인하기 위하여 Vuong test와 Parallelism test를 실시하고, 전․후를 구분하는 더미변수를 포함한 회귀분석을 실시한 결과, 영업손익 공시변경에 따른 영업손익의 변화가 주가와 주가수익률에 미치는 영향에 대한 유의적인 차이가 없다는 것을 확인하였다. 추가분석을 통하여 영업손익 공시변경으로 영업손실전환된 기업 중에서 과거부터 지속적인 영업이익을 공시하기 위해서 영업손실을 영업이익으로 상향 공시하는 빈도가 상장폐지를 회피하기 위해서 영업손실을 영업이익으로 상향 공시하는 빈도보다 더 높다는 것을 확인하였다. 또한 자율적으로 영업손익을 판단하는 회계기준 환경에서 당기순이익이 크고, 과거에 연속적으로 영업이익을 보고하였으며, 전년도에 영업이익이 양(+)인 기업일수록 영업이익을 상향조정하여 공시한다는 것을 확인하였다.
Abstract
This study investigates and compares the value relevance of operating income between the pre and the post revision of K-IFRS No. 1001 “Presentation of Financial Statements”. While operating income is decided according to the firm's economic conditions before the revision of K-IFRS, it is regulated by accounting standards after the revision of K-IFRS. According to the results of price level model, all of the coefficients , , and are significantly positive, which suggests that the stock price is higher as the book value per share, operating income per share, and non-operating income per share are greater. We also confirm that the value relevance of operating income between the pre and the post revision of K-IFRS is not significantly different, but that between 2011 and 2012 is significantly different through analysing Parallelism test and using dummy variable. According to the results of stock return model, all of the coefficients , and (2012 only) are significantly positive, which suggests that the stock return is higher as operating income ratio, and non-operating income ratio are greater. We also confirm that the value relevance of operating income between the pre and the post revision of K-IFRS is not significantly different, but that between 2011 and 2012 is significantly different through analysing Parallelism test and Vuong test and using dummy variable. Additionally, we test the same procedures above by dividing into KOSPI and KOSDAQ samples, and the results with full sample are similar to those with KOSDAQ and KOSPI samples. We also look into the historical operating income (loss) of firms which change from operating income to operating loss due to the revision of K-IFRS, and we confirm that the number of the consecutive operating income firms are more than that of the consecutive operating loss firms, which means that the consecutive operating income firms are more likely to avoid operating loss to remove the negative information effects than the consecutive operating loss firms are likely to avoid operating loss to avoid workout or delisting. We finally investigate the factors which increase or decrease operating income due to the revision of K-IFRS, and we confirm that all of the coefficients , , and are significantly negative, which suggests that the firms which disclose the higher net income, the more historical consecutive positive operating income, and the previous year's positive operating income are likely to manage the income statements to disclose the higher operating income.
- 발행기관:
- 한국국제회계학회
- 분류:
- 기타사회과학일반