이행기전의 이행거절과 채무자의 책임

The Clause 2 of the Article 544 of the Korea Civil Law stipulates that avoidance of contract can be made without notice (accompanied by additional period of time of reasonable length for performance) in the case of repudiation after performance is Due, and the related theories and precedents accept, in the event of bilateral contract. extinction of plea of simultaneous performance and delay of debtor without tender. However, there is a disagreement on whether repudiation Before Performance is Due(anticipatory breach) can be treated as a new type of non-performance. This study examines previous theories and precedents on anticipatory breach in Korea and the intention to legislate the Clause 2 of the Article 544 of the Korea Civil Law. It also suggests that anticipatory breach be acknowledged as a new type of non-performance by providing its legal basis. Finally, this study introduces various views on anticipatory breach expressed in the discussions on the revision of the Korea Civil Law, and suggests the direction for the revision of anticipatory breach