의무이행소송의 쟁점에 대한 고찰- 독일에서의 소송상 쟁점을 중심으로 -
Study on the Issue of Obligation Fulfillment Litigation - focusing on the litigation issue in Germany -
김연태(고려대학교)
72호, 469~513쪽
초록
행정현실의 변화와 고양된 국민의 권리의식을 반영하기 위하여 행정소송법 개정의 필요성이 학계와 실무계에서 지속적으로 제기되어 왔었다. 대법원이 2006. 9. 국회에 제출한 행정소송법 개정의견, 법무부가 2007. 7. 마련하여 2007. 11. 국회에 제출한 개정안, 그리고 법무부가 다시 2011. 11. 행정소송법 개정위원회를 구성하여 논의를 거쳐 2013. 3. 입법예고 한 개정안 등 그 동안의 행정소송법 개정작업에서는 현행 권리구제절차(거부처분 취소소송이나 부작위위법확인소송)의 불완전성을 해소하고 분쟁의 발본적·일회적 해결이 가능한 제도로서 의무이행소송을 도입하는 것에 대하여는 의견 일치를 보여주었다. 물론 의무이행소송제도의 구체적인 형성에 있어서는 여러 쟁점에 대하여 의견이 일치되지 않은 것도 있었다. 이 글에서는 2013. 3. 입법예고 된 법무부 개정안을 중심으로 개정안 마련 과정 중에서 논의되었던 의무이행소송 제도의 쟁점에 대하여 간략히 살펴보고, 우리보다 먼저 의무이행소송을 도입하여 그에 관한 판례와 학설이 집적되고 정리되어 온 독일의 의무이행소송 제도를 개관하고, 독일에서의 구체적 쟁점과 적용례에 대하여 고찰함으로써, 우리 의무이행소송 제도의 올바른 정립을 위한 시사점을 찾고자 한다. 행정소송의 체계와 입법 규율의 차이에 대한 이해를 바탕으로 하여 우리의 법과 현실에 맞는 우리의 의무이행소송이 정립될 수 있기를 기대한다.
Abstract
The necessity of amending the Administrative litigation Act has been raised continuously to both the Academic community and the Practice field in order to reflect the changes in the reality of Administration and the elevation of the nation’s right consciousness. Thus far, revision processes of the Administrative litigation Act have reached a common understanding about introducing Fulfillment of Obligation Litigation as a legal system which is capable of settling the instability of right remedy procedures(revocation of refusal disposition or litigation for affirmation of illegality omission) and of solving disputes in a radical and decisive manner. The efforts made so far to revise the Administrative litigation Act include : The revised comments of the Administrative litigation Act presented to the National Assembly by the Supreme Court in September 2006; The amendment of the Act written by the Ministry of Justice in July 2007 and presented to the National Assembly in November of the same year; and the ministry’s effort to form a Administrative Litigation Act Revision Committee in November 2011 to discuss an amendment and make a pre-announcement of legislation for it in March 2003. Yet in some cases differences in opinions also emerged concerning the detailed formation of the Fulfillment of Obligation Litigation system. Based on the amendment that Ministry of Justice made the pre-announcement of legislation for, this paper will briefly examine the issue of the Fulfillment of Obligation Litigation system that was discussed during the process of writing the amendment. After that, it will provide an overview on the Fulfillment of Obligation Litigation system in Germany where it was introduced before Korea and judical precedents and theories concerning Fulfillment of Obligation Litigation are accumulated and well-organized. Later, this paper will cover the consideration on the concrete issues and cases of application in Germany. By carrying out these tasks, this paper will attempt to seek the implication for the right establishment of the Fulfillment of Obligation Litigation system for Korea. It shall be my desire to see the establishment of Fulfillment of Obligation Litigation system which corresponds to the law and social reality in Korea based on the thorough understanding of the difference between administrative litigation system and legislation rule.
- 발행기관:
- 법학연구원
- 분류:
- 법학