애스크로AIPublic Preview
← 학술논문 검색
학술논문Geosystem Engineering2014.03 발행KCI 피인용 3

Predicting a promising fusion technology in geoscience and mineral resources engineering using Korean patent data

Predicting a promising fusion technology in geoscience and mineral resources engineering using Korean patent data

Dongjun Lee(Seoul National University); 유창석(Kyung Hee University)

17권 1호, 34~42쪽

초록

This study uses patent analysis to identify those sectors in Korean geoscience and mineral resources engineering where technology fusion is possible, and those that seem to hold the promise of fusion technologies. The analysis is conducted using geoscience and mineral engineering technology 2008–2012 patent data and Korean Standard Industrial Classification-International Patent Classification concordance table. Specifically, we use fusion and promising indexes proposed by Kang [Kang, H. J. (2006). A study on the projection of the promising fusion technologies by US patent analysis. KookminUniversity] to calculate and identify promising fusion technologies. The empirical results indicate that technologies in IPCsubclass separation (B01D); mixing, e.g., dissolving, emulsifying, dispersing (B01F); chemical or physical process, e.g.,catalysis, colloid chemistry (B01J); fuels, natural gas, synthetic natural gas (C10L); production or refining of metals (C22B);earth or rock drilling (E21B); investigating or analyzing materials by determining their chemical or physical properties(G01N); image data processing or generation (G06T); and signaling or calling systems (G08B) are promising fusiontechnologies. The technologies in these subclasses have been researched actively in recent years, and can be combined withother technologies more easily, based on our quantitative results. Therefore, assuming that this trend will continue at least fora few more years, the technologies in these subclasses could be promising fusion technologies.

Abstract

This study uses patent analysis to identify those sectors in Korean geoscience and mineral resources engineering where technology fusion is possible, and those that seem to hold the promise of fusion technologies. The analysis is conducted using geoscience and mineral engineering technology 2008–2012 patent data and Korean Standard Industrial Classification-International Patent Classification concordance table. Specifically, we use fusion and promising indexes proposed by Kang [Kang, H. J. (2006). A study on the projection of the promising fusion technologies by US patent analysis. KookminUniversity] to calculate and identify promising fusion technologies. The empirical results indicate that technologies in IPCsubclass separation (B01D); mixing, e.g., dissolving, emulsifying, dispersing (B01F); chemical or physical process, e.g.,catalysis, colloid chemistry (B01J); fuels, natural gas, synthetic natural gas (C10L); production or refining of metals (C22B);earth or rock drilling (E21B); investigating or analyzing materials by determining their chemical or physical properties(G01N); image data processing or generation (G06T); and signaling or calling systems (G08B) are promising fusiontechnologies. The technologies in these subclasses have been researched actively in recent years, and can be combined withother technologies more easily, based on our quantitative results. Therefore, assuming that this trend will continue at least fora few more years, the technologies in these subclasses could be promising fusion technologies.

발행기관:
한국자원공학회
DOI:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/12269328.2014.889262
분류:
자원공학

AI 법률 상담

이 논문의 주제에 대해 더 알고 싶으신가요?

460만+ 법률 자료에서 관련 판례·법령·해석례를 찾아 답변합니다

AI 상담 시작
Predicting a promising fusion technology in geoscience and mineral resources engineering using Korean patent data | Geosystem Engineering 2014 | AskLaw | 애스크로 AI