창의적 디자인융합인재의 사고양식 유형

Background This research intentionally defines capable persons who studieddesign and gained other knowledge as ‘Talented Persons in Design Convergence’in order to present the blueprint of creative persons in design convergence withdesign majors. This study also verifies the creativity of talented persons in designconvergence and discusses the psychological side of creative persons based on theperceptional thinking style. Methods The research classified the test groups according to scienceconvergence and design major and conducted a quantitative survey (as a creativity& thinking style test) in accordance with three research issues in order to explorecreative persons in convergence. Results The following sequence was made when listing the test groups inorder of high creativity: ①the group of talented persons in design convergence, ②the group of talented persons in non-design convergence, ③the group of designmajors, and ④the group of non-design majors. The group of talented persons indesign convergence preferred the ‘legislative’, ‘anarchic’ and ‘totalitarian’ thinkingstyles but relatively did not prefer the ‘conservative’ thinking style. Conclusion The talented persons in design convergence who converged designknowledge with other knowledge were found to have higher creative tendencythan those who combined other types of knowledge. Also, the talented personsin design convergence could be proposed as activation mechanisms of creativepersons. Through this, it is desirable that enterprises shall excavate design majorsand promote them to talented persons in convergence in order to prepare avirtual cycle structure which may create the sustainable innovation value of theenterprise.