기초지방선거에서의 정당공천제 폐지 실패사례 분석 - kingdon의 다중흐름모형을 중심으로 -

The purpose of the study is to provide the implications by analyzing with kingdon’s multiple streams framework the cause of policy output’s failure and of not switching party nomination system to decision agenda. By expanding party nomination to local councilors in 2006, Scholars, ngo, the public were discussing in earnest to abolish party nomination system. The pledge of presidential candidates’ abolition opened the policy window, and turned this policy problem to be governmental agenda. In the political streams, it attracted the policy makers’ attention, and grabbed at a chance to turn to be decision agenda by installation and debate of a national assembly committee for agreement. But, the partial coupling of three streams (problem, political, policy) closed the policy window, and it made to fail the policy output. According to the result of analysis, the political stream is the major cause of policy output’s failure. The specific causes are the opposition parties’ competition of superiority in local election, the prevention of political support base’s breakaway, the change in position of political interests, the passive attitude of the president. In the policy streams, the abolition of party nomination system didn’t meet the value acceptability of policy community, and it couldn’t reach the agreement and support of dominant political force. This study contributed to verify the theory by analyzing the political issues in the process of policy agenda setting, to expand the practical applicability, to identify importance of policy entrepreneurs’ role, to enhance objectivity and reliability of the analysis by utilizing a wide range of empirical data.