독일의 의료분쟁조정제도와 최근 동향

The potential of alternative non-judicial dispute resolution has been increasingly recognized in recent years, In practice, alternative dispute resolution plays in the implementation of the patient-claims against the physician an important role. Most important are the procedures for out-of-court redress bodies in Germany like the medical expertise committees and conciliation board, who have made ​​it their mission to resolve medical malpractice disputes by objective assessment physician union action. Overall evident in analysis of the data collected shows that the positive estimation is confirmed by statistical analysis of the assessments. In addition, it shows that the acceptance of the votes is high. The composition of juridical and medical expertise makes in court proceedings often problematic, but it would be easily possible in the alternative non-judicial dispute resolution process in which experts or inter-disciplinary occupied bodies are called. Therefore, in this study as shown below, it seeks to make a contribution to the developing field of a comparative analysis of dispute resolution and statistical analysis of the medical dispute resolution process in Germany (II and III) and attempt to show the its impact in terms of quality control for the possibility of voluntary participation (IV), and finally, look for the drawing of the conclusion.(V).