애스크로AIPublic Preview
← 학술논문 검색
학술논문안암법학2014.09 발행KCI 피인용 4

자본시장법상 '포괄적 사기금지규정'의 명확성 원칙상 문제점

Study on the Problems of the Financial Investment Services and Capital Market Act §178(1)-1 from the viewpoint of Void for Vagueness Doctrine

구길모(충남대학교)

45호, 1~29쪽

초록

Financial Investment Services and Capital Market Act(FISCMA) Article 178(1)-1 prohibits the activities utilizing an unfair artifice, scheme, or devices in connection with trading(including public offering, private placement, and sale in case of securities) and anybody who violates this artice shall be punished criminally. This provision is called as 'general anti-fraud clause'. It is established for preventing any securities frauds in the future. Korean Supreme Court has held that this clause doesn't need to be limited to fraud cases(2011. 10. 27. decided, decision number 2011do8109). In the criminal law area, the provision should have the highest definiteness. In this article, the author suggest some ideas about standards of vagueness doctrine in the criminal law area. Applying these standards, this provision is null and void for vagueness, because it cannot give minimal guidelines to the ordinary person and the lawyers. This provision violates 'the principle of nullum crimen sine lege' and the Korean Constitonal law. So this criminal sanction clause should be removed.

Abstract

Financial Investment Services and Capital Market Act(FISCMA) Article 178(1)-1 prohibits the activities utilizing an unfair artifice, scheme, or devices in connection with trading(including public offering, private placement, and sale in case of securities) and anybody who violates this artice shall be punished criminally. This provision is called as 'general anti-fraud clause'. It is established for preventing any securities frauds in the future. Korean Supreme Court has held that this clause doesn't need to be limited to fraud cases(2011. 10. 27. decided, decision number 2011do8109). In the criminal law area, the provision should have the highest definiteness. In this article, the author suggest some ideas about standards of vagueness doctrine in the criminal law area. Applying these standards, this provision is null and void for vagueness, because it cannot give minimal guidelines to the ordinary person and the lawyers. This provision violates 'the principle of nullum crimen sine lege' and the Korean Constitonal law. So this criminal sanction clause should be removed.

발행기관:
안암법학회
DOI:
http://dx.doi.org/10.22822/alr..45.201409.1
분류:
법학일반

AI 법률 상담

이 논문의 주제에 대해 더 알고 싶으신가요?

460만+ 법률 자료에서 관련 판례·법령·해석례를 찾아 답변합니다

AI 상담 시작
자본시장법상 '포괄적 사기금지규정'의 명확성 원칙상 문제점 | 안암법학 2014 | AskLaw | 애스크로 AI