애스크로AIPublic Preview
← 학술논문 검색
학술논문원광법학2014.09 발행KCI 피인용 2

공정거래법 및 상법상 일감몰아주기의 규제에 대한 소고-‘글로비스 사건’의 공정거래위원회 심결 및 판례를 중심으로-

The Regulation of the Act of Supporting with Volumes of Trade(Il-Gam-Mol-Ah-Joo-Gi) under the Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act and the Commercial Code -focusing on ‘Glovis case’-

문정해(원광대학교)

30권 3호, 65~95쪽

초록

The Act of Supporting with Volumes of Trade(Il-Gam-Mol-Ah-Joo-Gi) is regulated as a kind of the unfair trade practices under the Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act(hereinafter, “MRFTA”) in Korea. In 2007, the Fair Trade Commission(hereinafter, “FTC”) imposed a fine on the automaker and four units, including Kia Motors Corp., Hyundai Steel Co. and Glovis Co. for unfair trade with their sister units in breach of the fair competition rules. According to the FTC, Hyundai Motor was found to have illegally funded its auto-parts unit Hyundai Mobis Co. by paying excessive amounts of money on parts supplies, as well as having subsidized Hyundai Hysco through purchasing steel plates at higher costs. The nation's top two automakers, Hyundai Steel and Hyundai Mobis were also found to have allocated most of their orders to Glovis, the Hyundai Motor's freight unit. The article begins with a discussion of legal regimes relevant to the act of supporting with volumes of trade and the usurpation of corporate opportunity under the MRFTA and the Commercial Code, and then it examines critically the decisions of the court and the FTC in Glovis case.

Abstract

The Act of Supporting with Volumes of Trade(Il-Gam-Mol-Ah-Joo-Gi) is regulated as a kind of the unfair trade practices under the Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act(hereinafter, “MRFTA”) in Korea. In 2007, the Fair Trade Commission(hereinafter, “FTC”) imposed a fine on the automaker and four units, including Kia Motors Corp., Hyundai Steel Co. and Glovis Co. for unfair trade with their sister units in breach of the fair competition rules. According to the FTC, Hyundai Motor was found to have illegally funded its auto-parts unit Hyundai Mobis Co. by paying excessive amounts of money on parts supplies, as well as having subsidized Hyundai Hysco through purchasing steel plates at higher costs. The nation's top two automakers, Hyundai Steel and Hyundai Mobis were also found to have allocated most of their orders to Glovis, the Hyundai Motor's freight unit. The article begins with a discussion of legal regimes relevant to the act of supporting with volumes of trade and the usurpation of corporate opportunity under the MRFTA and the Commercial Code, and then it examines critically the decisions of the court and the FTC in Glovis case.

발행기관:
법학연구소
분류:
기타법학

AI 법률 상담

이 논문의 주제에 대해 더 알고 싶으신가요?

460만+ 법률 자료에서 관련 판례·법령·해석례를 찾아 답변합니다

AI 상담 시작
공정거래법 및 상법상 일감몰아주기의 규제에 대한 소고-‘글로비스 사건’의 공정거래위원회 심결 및 판례를 중심으로- | 원광법학 2014 | AskLaw | 애스크로 AI