법정형의 위헌성에 대한 헌법재판소 입장의 비판적 검토

In recent years there are many legislations that raise the limit of punishment. For example, the maximum of the imprisonment has been increased double since 2012. And some special criminal Acts has been enacted that represent ‘tough policy’ toward crimes and criminals. Therefore there are many appeals of the unconsitutionality of these Acts. But Korean Constitutional Court has shown very passive attitude in the reviewing of the unconstitutionality of these Acts. The purpose of this paper is to critisize the attitude of Korean Constitutional Court and to suggest some desirable alternatives. The contents of this paper is as follows: I. IntroductionII. The Principles of Legislating Criminal Law1. Legislative Discretion and its' Limits2. Subsidiarity and the Proportionality of the Punishment3. Positive ComparisonIII. Kcc’s Attitude toward the Unconstitutionality of the Harsh Punishment1. The Basic Position of the KCC2. The Crime of Hit and Run3. The Robbery causing Injury(KCC 1997. 8. 21. 93Hunba60)4. The Crime of Sexual Violence(KCC 2013. 7. 25. 2012Hunba320)IV. The Desirable Attitude of the KCC in Reviewing Unconstitutionality1. The Elements of Evauluation2. The Character of the Crime and the Purpose of the Provisions3. History and Culture, and the Social Situation4. People’s Attitude toward Crimes and the Criminal PolicyV. Conclusion