기업인수목적회사(SPAC)에 대한 법적 고찰
A Legal Study on Korean Special Purpose Acquisition Company
오영표(HMC Securities Company,)
3권 1호, 127~164쪽
초록
한국형 SPAC은 의무예치제도, Sponsor의 최소 투자비율, IPO 및 상장 심사를 통한 관리감독, 합병주주총회시 공모전주주의 의결권 및 주식매수청권 행사 제한, 공모전주주의 주식매각제한 등 투자자 보호를 위한 장치는 상당히 잘 정비되어 있는 것으로 판단된다. 그러나 SPAC이 일종의 투자기구의 성격을 강하게 보유한 주식회사라는 점을 고려하여 SPAC 설립 단계에서 금산법상 사전승인, 공정거래법상 계열회사 편입 및 기업결합신고 등 인허가와 관련한 예외규정이 필요하다. 한편, SPAC의 합병과 관련하여서는 SPAC의 원활한 합병이 가능하도록 주식매수청구권 행사가격과 합병가액 산정시 시가연동 산정방식의 예외를 두는 것 또한 필요하다. 특히, 2010. 5. 4. 입법예고된 법인세법 시행령 개정안은 SPAC에 한하여 합병대상법인의 지배주주의 주식보유기간을 단축시키는 예외를 두어야 할 것이다. 아울러 SPAC이 한국 자본시장에 어느 정도 정착한 단계에서는 SPAC의 기업결합방식을 합병으로만 제한할 것이 아니고 주식취득, 자산양수도, 영업양수도 등 다양한 기업결합방식이 가능하도록 하고, SPAC의 자금조달구조와 관련하여 독자적인 신주인수권 발행을 허용하여 SPAC의 구조설계에 있어서의 유연성을 도모할 필요가 있다. 끝으로 이 글이 향후 한국형 SPAC의 발전과 그로 인한 우리나라의 자본시장의 선진화에 미력하나마 보탬이 되기를 기대한다.
Abstract
A Special Purpose Acquisition Company (SPAC) is a blind investment vehicle that allows public investors to invest in private equity type transactions, particularly leveraged buyouts. SPACs are shell or blank-check companies that have no operations but go public with the intention of merging with or acquiring a company with the proceeds of the SPAC’s initial public offering (IPO). On December 21, 2009, Korean Financial Services Commission(FSC) adopted SPACs(hereinafter “Korean SPACs”), which are modified a little bit from American SPACs. Since Korean SPACs were introduced in Korea in December 2009 a half year ago, Korean SPACs are receiving much attention in the Korean capital market with five SPACs already having completed listing and ten more preparing for establishment or waiting for listing permission from KRX. The Korean SPACs are fairly well-designed in terms of investor protection thanks to such protective measures as obligatory trust account, sponsor’s minimum shareholding ratio, KRX’s review procedure during IPO and M&A, restriction of pre-IPO shareholders’ voting rights and appraisal rights in the shareholders’ meeting for the M&A and restriction on pre-IPO shareholders’ disposal of shares. But considering that Korean SPACs are corporations have the nature of an investment vehicle, it is necessary to allow exemptions from regulatory requirements such as prior approval under the Act on the Structural Improvement of the Financial Industry, reporting of company entering a business group and reporting of combination of enterprises under the Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act. Additionally, in order to facilitate a fluid M&A by SPAC, an exemption should be provided from the method of calculating the purchase price of appraisal rights of dissenting shareholders and merger value by reference to the market price. According to the advance notice of amendment to the Enforcement Decree of the Corporate Tax Law of May 4, 2010, the majority shareholder of the M&A target company must hold shares for at least three years to be eligible for tax reduction. This is expected to cause considerable hardship for the SPAC in finding a target company. Therefore we need to shorten the minimum holding period of the majority shareholder. Once the Korean SPACs becomes well established in the Korean capital market, other forms of business combinations should be allowed in addition to the currently allowed merger method, including acquisition of shares, acquisition of assets and acquisition of business. It is also necessary to provide for equitable treatment of pre-IPO shareholders and IPO shareholders by allowing issuance of naked warrants by the Korean SPACs. Having regard to Korean SPAC’s characteristics as an investment vehicle, I would like to encourage the government to adopt a more flexible policy to enable Korean SPACs to become well established in the Korean capital market.
- 발행기관:
- 은행법학회
- 분류:
- 사회과학일반