부채특성과 외국인지분율 간의 관련성
A Study on the Relation between Debt Financingand Foreign Equity
정현욱(영남대학교); 이현주(영남대학교)
56권 3호, 33~60쪽
초록
본 연구는 차입부채 중 사적부채의 비중이 높은 기업일수록 외국인지분율이 감소할 것이라는 가설을 설정하고 실증분석을 수행하였다. 본 연구의 가설은 사적부채비중이 높은 기업일수록 회계정보의 신뢰성 제고에 대한 효익이 낮을 것이라는 전성빈 등(2011)의 연구결과에 근거하여 설정하였다. 2003-2010년 기간 동안 금융업을 제외한 상장기업을 대상으로 실증분석을 수행한 결과, ‘(사적부채/(사적부채+공적부채))’로 측정한 사적부채비중의 회귀계수가 유의한 음(-)의 부호를 가지는 것으로 나타났다. 이는 본 연구의 가설과 일관된 것으로, 차입부채 중 사적부채(공적부채)의 비중이 높아질수록 외국인지분율은 감소(증가)하는 것으로 해석할 수 있다. 이는 2단계최소제곱법(2SLS)으로 실증분석을 수행하여도 일관된 것으로 나타났다. 본 연구에서는 추가분석으로 변수를 수준(level)변수로 측정하지 않고, 변화량(당기-전기)으로 측정하여 실증분석하여도 그 결과는 일관된 것으로 나타났다. 또한, 본 연구에서는 부채비율이 높은 기업을 대상으로 전성빈 등(2011)의 방법론을 이용하여 실증분석하였는데 그 결과도 본 연구의 가설과 일관된 것으로 나타났다. 본 연구는 타인자본과 관련된 부채의 상이한 특성은 회계정보의 신뢰성과 체계적인 관련성을 가지고, 외국인투자자들은 부채특성을 차별적으로 인식하여 투자의사결정에 활용하고 있다는 자료를 제시한다는 점에서 공헌점이 있다고 판단된다. 또한 부채특성이 외국인투자자의 투자의사결정에 미치는 추가적인 결정요인이 될 수 있다는 정보를 제공하는 점에서 중요한 시사점이 있을 것으로 기대된다.
Abstract
This study investigates whether the types of debt financing (i.e., private debt versus public debt) is associated with foreign equity ownership. Prior studies on the types of debt financing suggest that private debt ratio is negatively associated with quality of earnings. But public debt ratio is positively associated with quality of earnings. Thus we expect private debt ratio to be negatively related with foreign equity ownership, and the public debt ratio to be positively related with foreign equity ownership. Kang and Stulz(1997) investigated fators that affect foreign investors’ making decisions to select portfolio in Japan’s stock market for the period of 1975-1991. They report manufacturing industries, large firms, firms with good accounting performance, low unsystematic risk(leverage) as factors affecting foreign investors’ making decisions. Cheon(2003) investigated association between foreign ownership and earnings quality. Cheon(2003) reports that foreign ownership is positively related to earnings quality. But cheon(2003) reports that domestic-institutional ownership is not related to earnings quality. This means that foreign investors consider earnings but domestic-institutional investor do not consider earnings quality. Bharath et al.(2008) report that earnings quality affects the choice of debt(private debt and public debt). Especially Bharath et al.(2008) report that firms of low-earnings quality prefer private debt to public debt. Chun et al.(2011) tested association between debt financing and earnings management(accrual-based earnings management measured by cross-sectional version of modified Jones medel(Dechow et al.(1995) and real activity management measured by cross-sectional version of Roychowhury’s(2006)). Chun et al.(2011) report that firms with relatively high-public debts are less likely to engage in both accrual-based earnings management and real activity management) In this respect, we investigated whether the type debt financing(private debt ratio) is associated foreign equity ownership. The sample consists of non-financial listed KOSPI firms during 2003-2010 period. Foreign equity ownership is used as dependent variable, and private debt ratio(private debt/(private debt+public debt)) is used as independent variable. After controlling for variables related with foreign equity ownership as reported in previous studies, the regression coefficient for the private debt ratio shows statistically significant negative sign. To control for potential endogeneity, 2SLS(two-Stage Least Squares) test has been performed. The empirical result is consistent with the prediction of the research hypothesis. Also, additional test using difference term(between year t and t-1) provides similar results. That is, the types of debt financing affects foreign ownership level, after controlling for known variables. This study contributes to extant literature on foreign equity by providing evidence that types of debt financing affects foreigners’ portfolio selection. The results may help policy makers extend their knowledge on elements affecting foreigners’ investment decisions.
- 발행기관:
- 한국공인회계사회
- 분류:
- 회계학