애스크로AIPublic Preview
← 학술논문 검색
학술논문IT와 법연구2015.02 발행KCI 피인용 1

자율계산대를 이용한 불법영득행위 - 독일의 논의를 중심으로 -

Illegal profits acquisitions through exploiting the self-checkout -focused on discussion in Germany

김성룡(경북대학교)

10호, 181~205쪽

초록

This paper deals with the problem of distinguishing between theft and computer fraud surrounding the self-checkout from the point of view of criminal law. The subject of this paper is especially focused on discussion relating to computer fraud (“Computerbetrug”) in Germany that could be extended to the discussion in Korea. OLG Hamm in NW, Germany decided the following case: The defendant took from the magazine shelf of a supermarket a “Playboy” for 5 EUR and went to the self-service checkout. He scanned but not the one found on the “Playboy” bar code, but kept the previously torn out of the newspaper “WAZ” bar code, which he had done in his wallet with him at the reader. The self checkout computer then threw out the price of a “WAZ” for 1.20 EUR, which the defendant paid. Then he left with the “Playboy” the business. AG und LG have recognized the defendant’s act as a computer Fraud, but OLG Hamm has seen it as a theft. In this paper, I introduce the main contents of the doctrine and case law relating to the discussion of the computer fraud and theft in Germany and summarize what kinds of implications for Korea the German discussion has.

Abstract

This paper deals with the problem of distinguishing between theft and computer fraud surrounding the self-checkout from the point of view of criminal law. The subject of this paper is especially focused on discussion relating to computer fraud (“Computerbetrug”) in Germany that could be extended to the discussion in Korea. OLG Hamm in NW, Germany decided the following case: The defendant took from the magazine shelf of a supermarket a “Playboy” for 5 EUR and went to the self-service checkout. He scanned but not the one found on the “Playboy” bar code, but kept the previously torn out of the newspaper “WAZ” bar code, which he had done in his wallet with him at the reader. The self checkout computer then threw out the price of a “WAZ” for 1.20 EUR, which the defendant paid. Then he left with the “Playboy” the business. AG und LG have recognized the defendant’s act as a computer Fraud, but OLG Hamm has seen it as a theft. In this paper, I introduce the main contents of the doctrine and case law relating to the discussion of the computer fraud and theft in Germany and summarize what kinds of implications for Korea the German discussion has.

발행기관:
IT와 법연구소
분류:
기타법학

AI 법률 상담

이 논문의 주제에 대해 더 알고 싶으신가요?

460만+ 법률 자료에서 관련 판례·법령·해석례를 찾아 답변합니다

AI 상담 시작