「사회기반시설에 대한 민간투자사업법」에 따른 행정계약의 법적 성격에 관한 연구(서울시메트로9호선(주)의 서울시 운임신고 반려처분 취소 소송사건을 중심으로)

Some of the administrative regions have been made to the contract type. The possibility of a legal dispute with the stakeholders, including the parties to the contract administration is increasing. When in infrastructure building measures for the region to pursue profits, the actual utilization of the public sector and the anger of the underprivileged in accordance with the inequality gap between rich and poor, people of the sovereign is the root of the process, which aims to 'equality' in the course of devoted customers see that the crisis could lead to skepticism about the idea of the existence of the national community. Public sector legitimacy to realize benefits administration through public service activities derive from the public nature of the administration pursued. Administrative agreement will be evaluated in the public interest criteria To improve the administrative litigation system should be able to handle the above legal elements of the administrative contract in appeal proceedings. The Standing should extend to the user or interested parties, including the parties to the contract administration. You need to specify an administrative agreement with the parties subject to administrative procedure law litigation. The legislative efforts to amend the administrative procedure law is needed.