애스크로AIPublic Preview
← 학술논문 검색
학술논문역사학보2015.06 발행KCI 피인용 9

‘장정체제’에 대한 조선 정부의 저항과 만국공법

Chosun’s resistance to ‘the agreement system(章程體制)’ and international law

박은숙(고려대학교)

226호, 155~186쪽

초록

Chosun dynasty signed a treaty with Japan under international law(萬國公法) in 1876. Since Chosun had been influenced by the dual international order of traditional tribute system and new capitalistic world system. China recognized the crisis of the tribute system in Chosun. And Chosun and China signed Chosun-China agreement for maritime and overland Trade(朝中商民水陸貿易章程) in 1882. The agreement defined the status of Chosun as ‘vassal state(屬邦)’ and China’s exclusive privilege in Chosun. After China had pressured on the internal affairs and foreign affairs of the Chosun. Chosun resisted interference of China in accordance international law. Foreign Ministry officials insisted independence of Chosun and equality of all countries. They tried to revise the agreement with China. They asked for the withdrawal of the Chinese merchants in seoul. And tried to changeover from the agreement system(章程體制) to the treaty system(條約體制). But trials of Chosun had been frustrated by the stratagem of China. The agreement system had been maintained to disturbing the modernization of Chosun until Sino-Japanese War in 1894.

Abstract

Chosun dynasty signed a treaty with Japan under international law(萬國公法) in 1876. Since Chosun had been influenced by the dual international order of traditional tribute system and new capitalistic world system. China recognized the crisis of the tribute system in Chosun. And Chosun and China signed Chosun-China agreement for maritime and overland Trade(朝中商民水陸貿易章程) in 1882. The agreement defined the status of Chosun as ‘vassal state(屬邦)’ and China’s exclusive privilege in Chosun. After China had pressured on the internal affairs and foreign affairs of the Chosun. Chosun resisted interference of China in accordance international law. Foreign Ministry officials insisted independence of Chosun and equality of all countries. They tried to revise the agreement with China. They asked for the withdrawal of the Chinese merchants in seoul. And tried to changeover from the agreement system(章程體制) to the treaty system(條約體制). But trials of Chosun had been frustrated by the stratagem of China. The agreement system had been maintained to disturbing the modernization of Chosun until Sino-Japanese War in 1894.

발행기관:
역사학회
DOI:
http://dx.doi.org/10.16912/tkhr.2015.06.226.155
분류:
역사학

AI 법률 상담

이 논문의 주제에 대해 더 알고 싶으신가요?

460만+ 법률 자료에서 관련 판례·법령·해석례를 찾아 답변합니다

AI 상담 시작
‘장정체제’에 대한 조선 정부의 저항과 만국공법 | 역사학보 2015 | AskLaw | 애스크로 AI