애스크로AIPublic Preview
← 학술논문 검색
학술논문금융법연구2015.08 발행

기왕증감액약관 - 대법원 2015.3.26. 선고 2014다229917, 229924 판결 -

Study on the Clause of Subtracting the Claim in the Ratio of the Already Suffered Disease

장덕조(서강대학교); 남하균(울산대학교)

12권 2호, 183~208쪽

초록

This paper is to study and analyze recent important cases held by the Korean Supreme Court. The personal accident insurance has been dealt on the issue of reduction of the claim. The court holds that insurance company can subtract the claim in the ratio of the already suffered disease. However the holding needs to be scrutinized in the aspects of the nature of a personal insurance. This paper also debates the explanation duty of an insurer as applied to insurance coverage disputes. Courts and most scholars have argues for the soul of contract law. Under the traditional contract theory, the assent of both parties to the terms of an agreement is necessary for creation of an enforceable contract. Provisions excluding or limiting coverage, according to the theory, would not be enforceable because of "substantialness". However, it is very difficult to discern the substantial clause and the non-substantial. And so forth, this paper also explorers some the point at issues of insurance law. In this Paper, I enunciate some suggestions of the reasonable theory to our debate about the legal nature of insurance policy.

Abstract

This paper is to study and analyze recent important cases held by the Korean Supreme Court. The personal accident insurance has been dealt on the issue of reduction of the claim. The court holds that insurance company can subtract the claim in the ratio of the already suffered disease. However the holding needs to be scrutinized in the aspects of the nature of a personal insurance. This paper also debates the explanation duty of an insurer as applied to insurance coverage disputes. Courts and most scholars have argues for the soul of contract law. Under the traditional contract theory, the assent of both parties to the terms of an agreement is necessary for creation of an enforceable contract. Provisions excluding or limiting coverage, according to the theory, would not be enforceable because of "substantialness". However, it is very difficult to discern the substantial clause and the non-substantial. And so forth, this paper also explorers some the point at issues of insurance law. In this Paper, I enunciate some suggestions of the reasonable theory to our debate about the legal nature of insurance policy.

발행기관:
한국금융법학회
DOI:
http://dx.doi.org/10.15692/KJFL.12.2.7
분류:
법학

AI 법률 상담

이 논문의 주제에 대해 더 알고 싶으신가요?

460만+ 법률 자료에서 관련 판례·법령·해석례를 찾아 답변합니다

AI 상담 시작
기왕증감액약관 - 대법원 2015.3.26. 선고 2014다229917, 229924 판결 - | 금융법연구 2015 | AskLaw | 애스크로 AI