애스크로AIPublic Preview
← 학술논문 검색
학술논문중재연구2015.09 발행KCI 피인용 1

CISG and Arbitration Agreements: A Janus-Faced Practice and How to Cope with It

CISG and Arbitration Agreements: A Janus-Faced Practice and How to Cope with It

Gustav Flecke-Giammarco(Heuking Kühn Lüer Wojtek); Alexander Grimm(Higher Regional Court Frankfurt)

25권 3호, 33~58쪽

초록

Arbitration clauses or institutional arbitration rules rarely, if ever, specify the law applicable to the arbitration agreement. A wide range of laws may thus govern this question, such as the law at the place of arbitration, the law where the agreement or the award is enforced or the law of the main contract between the parties. It is also conceivable that international uniform law or soft law may play a role. Tribunals and courts seized with this question must consequently decide which of these various laws shall apply to verify the existence and validity of the arbitration agreement. This paper picks up on this controversially debated conflict of laws issue. At times, this debate is characterized by a strong divide between arbitration and international trade law practitioners. But are the different approaches really leading to diverging results in arbitral practice?

Abstract

Arbitration clauses or institutional arbitration rules rarely, if ever, specify the law applicable to the arbitration agreement. A wide range of laws may thus govern this question, such as the law at the place of arbitration, the law where the agreement or the award is enforced or the law of the main contract between the parties. It is also conceivable that international uniform law or soft law may play a role. Tribunals and courts seized with this question must consequently decide which of these various laws shall apply to verify the existence and validity of the arbitration agreement. This paper picks up on this controversially debated conflict of laws issue. At times, this debate is characterized by a strong divide between arbitration and international trade law practitioners. But are the different approaches really leading to diverging results in arbitral practice?

발행기관:
한국중재학회
DOI:
http://dx.doi.org/10.16998/jas.2015.25.3.33
분류:
무역학

AI 법률 상담

이 논문의 주제에 대해 더 알고 싶으신가요?

460만+ 법률 자료에서 관련 판례·법령·해석례를 찾아 답변합니다

AI 상담 시작
CISG and Arbitration Agreements: A Janus-Faced Practice and How to Cope with It | 중재연구 2015 | AskLaw | 애스크로 AI