지방공기업 경영평가의 효과성 인식에 대한 경영형태별 차이 분석

This paper is to analyze the members’ cognitive differences on effectiveness of management evaluation by three local public corporations(LPCs) types - local government corporation, local public authorities and local public enterprises - and then to suggest some recommendations. The quality and utilization of evaluation results is the essential factors in management evaluation and performance improvement of LPCs. In this respect, we construct the paths through which the management evaluation affects the performance of LPCs, and discover some variables to analyze the differences. The results show that the local public authorities are highest in every aspects including validity of evaluation system, propriety of evaluation, fairness and utilization of evaluation results, etc., and then local public enterprises are higher than the local government corporations. The root cause why the local government corporations are low in every aspect is that it have the least of management autonomy among the three corporation forms. The difference between the local public authorities and the local public enterprise was originated from the degree of government-dependence or market-exposure. The local public authorities are more heavily dependent on government and hard to prove its organizational performance except management evaluation, so they respond to the evaluation more sensitively than local public enterprises. This results suggest that the closer to the government the management types is the more the management evaluation system needs. In this respect, management evaluation system of LPCs can be regarded as ‘managed market’ or ‘quasi-competition mechanism’ as it is known.