애스크로AIPublic Preview
← 학술논문 검색
학술논문法學論文集2015.12 발행KCI 피인용 2

해방기(1945-1948) 헌법초안의 사법조항 분석-좌파, 우파, 중간파 및 미 군정청 헌법초안을 중심으로-

The Judiciary Provisions in the Draft Constitutions of the Immediate Post-Liberation Period : Left-wing Draft Constitution, Right-wing Draft Constitution, Moderate-wing Draft Constitution, and USAMGIK Draft Constitution

신우철(중앙대학교)

39권 3호, 5~59쪽

초록

What was the type of judicial system that we, the people of Korea actually wanted in the immediate post-liberation period? To answer this question, I analyzed the ju- diciary provisions of various “Draft Constitutions” during 1946—1947. In the judi- ciary provisions of the left-wing Draft Constitution, Joseonminjugonghwaguk Imsi- yakbeop(Provisional Draft of the Constitution of the Korean Democratic Republic), and the left-wing reply to the US-USSR Joint Commission, it is noted that the judges shall be “elected” and the jury system shall be adopted. Following the example of the Soviet Constitution, it is provided that the independent prosecutors’ office shall have extensive powers and shall be parallel to the court. On the contrary to this, in the judiciary provisions of the right-wing Draft Constitution, Hanguk Heonbeop (The Constitution of Korea), and the right-wing reply to the US-USSR Joint Commission, it is noted that the judges shall be “nominated” and the adoption of the jury system shall be postponed. Modelled after Western judicial system, it is provided that the independence of the courts and the judges, including judges’ lifetime appointments, shall be guaranteed. In the judiciary provisions of the moderate-wing Draft Constitutions, repre- sented by Daehanminguk Imsiheonbeop(Provisional Constitution of the Republic of Korea) and Joseon Imsiyakheon(Provisional Draft of the Constitution of Korea), as well as in the moderate-wing reply to the US-USSR Joint Commission, it is noted that the tenure of the judges shall be ten years and the appointment of the supreme court justices, who have the power of judicial constitutionality review, shall be con- troled indirectly by the congress or directly by the citizens. As in the left-wing ju- diciary provisions, it is also provided that the jury system shall be adopted. In the judiciary provisions of Emery J. Woodall’s Draft Constitution(The Constitution of Korea) prepared by the US Army Military Government in Korea(USAMGIK) and Draft Con- stitutions prepared by the US delegation to the US-USSR Joint Commission(The Proposed Charter of the Provisional Korean Democratic Government[A⋅B⋅C]), it is noted that the judges, unlike in the left-wing judiciary provisions, shall not be elected and they, unlike in the right-wing judiciary provisions, shall not enjoy lifetime appointments.

Abstract

What was the type of judicial system that we, the people of Korea actually wanted in the immediate post-liberation period? To answer this question, I analyzed the ju- diciary provisions of various “Draft Constitutions” during 1946—1947. In the judi- ciary provisions of the left-wing Draft Constitution, Joseonminjugonghwaguk Imsi- yakbeop(Provisional Draft of the Constitution of the Korean Democratic Republic), and the left-wing reply to the US-USSR Joint Commission, it is noted that the judges shall be “elected” and the jury system shall be adopted. Following the example of the Soviet Constitution, it is provided that the independent prosecutors’ office shall have extensive powers and shall be parallel to the court. On the contrary to this, in the judiciary provisions of the right-wing Draft Constitution, Hanguk Heonbeop (The Constitution of Korea), and the right-wing reply to the US-USSR Joint Commission, it is noted that the judges shall be “nominated” and the adoption of the jury system shall be postponed. Modelled after Western judicial system, it is provided that the independence of the courts and the judges, including judges’ lifetime appointments, shall be guaranteed. In the judiciary provisions of the moderate-wing Draft Constitutions, repre- sented by Daehanminguk Imsiheonbeop(Provisional Constitution of the Republic of Korea) and Joseon Imsiyakheon(Provisional Draft of the Constitution of Korea), as well as in the moderate-wing reply to the US-USSR Joint Commission, it is noted that the tenure of the judges shall be ten years and the appointment of the supreme court justices, who have the power of judicial constitutionality review, shall be con- troled indirectly by the congress or directly by the citizens. As in the left-wing ju- diciary provisions, it is also provided that the jury system shall be adopted. In the judiciary provisions of Emery J. Woodall’s Draft Constitution(The Constitution of Korea) prepared by the US Army Military Government in Korea(USAMGIK) and Draft Con- stitutions prepared by the US delegation to the US-USSR Joint Commission(The Proposed Charter of the Provisional Korean Democratic Government[A⋅B⋅C]), it is noted that the judges, unlike in the left-wing judiciary provisions, shall not be elected and they, unlike in the right-wing judiciary provisions, shall not enjoy lifetime appointments.

발행기관:
법학연구원
DOI:
http://dx.doi.org/10.22853/caujls.2015.39.3.5
분류:
기타법학

AI 법률 상담

이 논문의 주제에 대해 더 알고 싶으신가요?

460만+ 법률 자료에서 관련 판례·법령·해석례를 찾아 답변합니다

AI 상담 시작
해방기(1945-1948) 헌법초안의 사법조항 분석-좌파, 우파, 중간파 및 미 군정청 헌법초안을 중심으로- | 法學論文集 2015 | AskLaw | 애스크로 AI