애스크로AIPublic Preview
← 학술논문 검색
학술논문Global Business and Finance Review2015.06 발행KCI 피인용 4

The Relative Value Relevance of U.S. GAAP and IFRS

The Relative Value Relevance of U.S. GAAP and IFRS

Kriengkai Boonlert‐U‐Thai(Chulalongkorn University, Thailand); Orapin Duangploy(Dhurakij Pundit University, Thailand)

20권 1호, 105~120쪽

초록

The SEC has allowed foreign private issuers prepared under IFRS without reconciliation since November 2007 and is currently seeking feedback regarding its consideration of allowing US listed companies the option to file supplementary financial reports under IFRS. This study re‐investigates the usefulness of recent 20‐F data on accounting based valuation models: earnings capitalization, book value of equity, and Ohlson (1995). The purpose of this study is to provide the effect of other information in 20‐F captured by differences between IFRS and U.S.GAAP accounting numbers on value relevance of earnings, book value, and both. Using 35 European firms during 2006‐ 2007 in a number of European countries and a range of industries, this study shows no value relevance of differences in earnings and book value between IFRS and U.S. GAAP. These results imply that IFRS is comparable to U.S. GAAP and the elimination of 20‐F reconciliation is suitable.

Abstract

The SEC has allowed foreign private issuers prepared under IFRS without reconciliation since November 2007 and is currently seeking feedback regarding its consideration of allowing US listed companies the option to file supplementary financial reports under IFRS. This study re‐investigates the usefulness of recent 20‐F data on accounting based valuation models: earnings capitalization, book value of equity, and Ohlson (1995). The purpose of this study is to provide the effect of other information in 20‐F captured by differences between IFRS and U.S.GAAP accounting numbers on value relevance of earnings, book value, and both. Using 35 European firms during 2006‐ 2007 in a number of European countries and a range of industries, this study shows no value relevance of differences in earnings and book value between IFRS and U.S. GAAP. These results imply that IFRS is comparable to U.S. GAAP and the elimination of 20‐F reconciliation is suitable.

발행기관:
사람과세계경영학회
DOI:
http://dx.doi.org/10.17549/gbfr.2015.20.1.105
분류:
경영학일반

AI 법률 상담

이 논문의 주제에 대해 더 알고 싶으신가요?

460만+ 법률 자료에서 관련 판례·법령·해석례를 찾아 답변합니다

AI 상담 시작
The Relative Value Relevance of U.S. GAAP and IFRS | Global Business and Finance Review 2015 | AskLaw | 애스크로 AI