The Two Different Crises of Agreement in the Challenger Disaster Case
The Two Different Crises of Agreement in the Challenger Disaster Case
김윤호(서울시립대학교)
15권 1호, 257~281쪽
초록
This study analyzes the Challenger disaster case based on the framework of distinctive features of groupthink (GT) and Abilene paradox (AP). The case analysis found that two different crises of agreement occurred at different levels of NASA’s Flight Readiness Review Process: GT at Level 1; and AP at Levels 3 (Marshall Center) and 4 (Thiokol Caucus). Several implications are illustrated for the directions of future research on GT and AP. This study suggests that GT and AP can occur together within a hierarchical or organizational structure on the same issue of decision-making. The study is meaningful in that the Challenger case has never been studied through the framework of the Abilene Paradox perspective.
Abstract
This study analyzes the Challenger disaster case based on the framework of distinctive features of groupthink (GT) and Abilene paradox (AP). The case analysis found that two different crises of agreement occurred at different levels of NASA’s Flight Readiness Review Process: GT at Level 1; and AP at Levels 3 (Marshall Center) and 4 (Thiokol Caucus). Several implications are illustrated for the directions of future research on GT and AP. This study suggests that GT and AP can occur together within a hierarchical or organizational structure on the same issue of decision-making. The study is meaningful in that the Challenger case has never been studied through the framework of the Abilene Paradox perspective.
- 발행기관:
- 한국인사행정학회
- 분류:
- 행정학