애스크로AIPublic Preview
← 학술논문 검색
학술논문노동법학2016.06 발행KCI 피인용 7

미국 공정근로기준법과 가사사용인의 법적지위

The Legal Status of Domestic Workers under the FLSA(1974)

김미영(경기대학교)

58호, 1~23쪽

초록

In 2000s, California and New York have collectively bargained with the labor union of domestic workers, and passed the Domestic Worker’s Bill of Right to put domestic workers into their own state labor laws, respectively. It has transfered the issues of domestic workers’ working conditions from the sphere of illegal immigrant women or international labor trafficking to the area of labor laws in the U.S. Furthermore, the DOL has revisioned the regulations to narrow the scope of FLSA exemptions for some domestic workers. Such legal changes may reflect the commercialization of household works and rapid growth of personal service jobs in the structure of service economy. Also, South Korea, as a industrial society, has very similar issues to the U.S in the aspect of labor law for domestic workers. When comparing to the U.S, it is difficult to say that the Korean labor laws have been proceeded for including domestic worker in the protection. My question is why most of industrial countries have kept domestic workers out of the labor law systems. This is to search for the legal reasons and institutional history excluding the employment of domestic workers from the system of labor laws by analzing and observing the legal changes of the U.S labor laws.

Abstract

In 2000s, California and New York have collectively bargained with the labor union of domestic workers, and passed the Domestic Worker’s Bill of Right to put domestic workers into their own state labor laws, respectively. It has transfered the issues of domestic workers’ working conditions from the sphere of illegal immigrant women or international labor trafficking to the area of labor laws in the U.S. Furthermore, the DOL has revisioned the regulations to narrow the scope of FLSA exemptions for some domestic workers. Such legal changes may reflect the commercialization of household works and rapid growth of personal service jobs in the structure of service economy. Also, South Korea, as a industrial society, has very similar issues to the U.S in the aspect of labor law for domestic workers. When comparing to the U.S, it is difficult to say that the Korean labor laws have been proceeded for including domestic worker in the protection. My question is why most of industrial countries have kept domestic workers out of the labor law systems. This is to search for the legal reasons and institutional history excluding the employment of domestic workers from the system of labor laws by analzing and observing the legal changes of the U.S labor laws.

발행기관:
한국노동법학회
분류:
노동법

AI 법률 상담

이 논문의 주제에 대해 더 알고 싶으신가요?

460만+ 법률 자료에서 관련 판례·법령·해석례를 찾아 답변합니다

AI 상담 시작
미국 공정근로기준법과 가사사용인의 법적지위 | 노동법학 2016 | AskLaw | 애스크로 AI