집회 및 시위에 관한 법률상 중복 집회 신고의 금지통고 규정에 대한 연구 - 대법원 2014. 12. 11. 선고 2011도13299 판결의 평석을 중심으로 -

Because the maximum guarantees freedom of an assembly of the person whom an assembly was able to reach later, judgment of the Decision 2014. 12. 11. Sentence, 2011Do13299 of the Supreme Court that Chief jurisdiction police officer must not give notice of prohibition to the person whom an assembly was able to reach for a mere time reason in an repetition assembly later, and, does it, and he or she cannot punish such a prohibition notice even if he or she violates in the Law on Assembly and Demonstration, this Decision 2014. 12. 11. Sentence, 2011Do13299 of the Supreme Courtt is proper. Therefore, the rule that the jurisdiction police officer head can offer with eight lines of the Law on Assembly and Demonstration Clause 2s revised on January 27, 2016 so that it can be worse without a repetition assembly interfering each other is desirable because it is wide and guarantees freedom of an assembly of a report of assembly figure person in a repetition assembly later. A future the law on assembly and demonstration must improve it to be able to force time and the side of adjustment plan of a place between in front of and assembly when it is very likely that it is the assembly new high price falsehood that Chief observation police officer is in front. And a clause 3 of an article 6 in the law on assembly and demonstration must improve penal servitude and fine punishment when they violate it in this rule to levy. In addition, the law on assembly and demonstration must improve it when the date that was not able to hold assembly report in assembly dates is considerable so that it is not possible for an assembly at an assembly place of pertinence in a schedule period.