애스크로AIPublic Preview
← 학술논문 검색
학술논문중재연구2016.09 발행KCI 피인용 1

Recent changes to the Korean Arbitration Act and its Comparison with Singapore: Korea’s Potential to Become an Arbitration Hub

Recent changes to the Korean Arbitration Act and its Comparison with Singapore: Korea’s Potential to Become an Arbitration Hub

김재현(KASAN IP & Law Firm); Bryan E. Hopkins(Lee & Ko)

26권 3호, 27~50쪽

초록

International arbitration as a dispute resolution mechanism in Asia is growing in popularity. Singapore has long been acknowledged as a regional arbitration center but Korea is now facing an increased demand as an arbitration center as well. As Singapore competes with Hong Kong and other international arbitration centers, and as Korea tries to become an alternative to Singapore, both Singapore and Korea have updated their arbitral laws and arbitration rules to reflect the current international arbitration trends. This paper examines the recent changes in the arbitration laws of Singapore and Korea, with an emphasis on recent changes in Korean arbitration laws that are designed to increase Korea’s popularity as a regional arbitration center. Though Korea’s reputation as an arbitration center is increasing, it is still not viewed as a major arbitration service provider. It is against this backdrop that Korea’s international arbitration laws and rules will be viewed, with suggested changes to increase Korea’s reputation as not only a regional hub but a center of international arbitration.

Abstract

International arbitration as a dispute resolution mechanism in Asia is growing in popularity. Singapore has long been acknowledged as a regional arbitration center but Korea is now facing an increased demand as an arbitration center as well. As Singapore competes with Hong Kong and other international arbitration centers, and as Korea tries to become an alternative to Singapore, both Singapore and Korea have updated their arbitral laws and arbitration rules to reflect the current international arbitration trends. This paper examines the recent changes in the arbitration laws of Singapore and Korea, with an emphasis on recent changes in Korean arbitration laws that are designed to increase Korea’s popularity as a regional arbitration center. Though Korea’s reputation as an arbitration center is increasing, it is still not viewed as a major arbitration service provider. It is against this backdrop that Korea’s international arbitration laws and rules will be viewed, with suggested changes to increase Korea’s reputation as not only a regional hub but a center of international arbitration.

발행기관:
한국중재학회
DOI:
http://dx.doi.org/10.16998/jas.2016.26.3.27
분류:
무역학

AI 법률 상담

이 논문의 주제에 대해 더 알고 싶으신가요?

460만+ 법률 자료에서 관련 판례·법령·해석례를 찾아 답변합니다

AI 상담 시작
Recent changes to the Korean Arbitration Act and its Comparison with Singapore: Korea’s Potential to Become an Arbitration Hub | 중재연구 2016 | AskLaw | 애스크로 AI