애스크로AIPublic Preview
← 학술논문 검색
학술논문회계저널2016.12 발행

연금펀드에 대한 조세지원 정책이 자본시장에 미치는 영향

Effects of Tax Expenditures for Pension Funds on Capital Market

박수진(서울시립대학교 세무학 박사); 전병욱(서울시립대학교)

25권 6호, 41~69쪽

초록

본 연구에서는 노후를 대비하기 위한 연금펀드가 운용되는 자본시장, 특히 자산운용시장이 조세지원 정책의 변동에 따라 반응하는지를 실증분석 하였다. 연금펀드는 연금 과세제도의 적용을 받기 때문에 납입 단계의 공제, 운용 단계의 비과세 및 수령 단계의 저율과세가 적용된다. 그리고 수령액에 대한 금융소득 종합과세도 적용되지 않기 때문에 일반 펀드에 비해 상대적으로 조세혜택이 부여된 투자자산이라고 할 수 있다. 또한, 세법개정에 따라 연금펀드에 대한 조세혜택의 범위가 확대될 경우에 세법개정 이후의 연금펀드는 세법개정 이전에 비해 조세혜택이 더 많이 부여된 투자자산이라 할 수 있다. 조세혜택자산인 연금펀드가 거래되는 자산운용시장에서 조세요인의 변동으로 인한 투자자 반응을 연금펀드의 수익률, 설정금액 및 환매금액에 미치는 영향을 통해 확인하였다. 실증분석 한 결과, 연금펀드 수익률의 측면에서는 연금펀드에 대한 유리한 세법 개정의 경우에는 세전수익률이 감소하는 반면 불리한 세법 개정의 경우에는 세전수익률이 증가해서 암묵적 조세의 효과를 관찰할 수 있었다. 다만, 연금저축 상품에 대한 소득공제가 세액공제로 전환된 2014년의 경우에는 불리한 세법 개정의 효과가 연금펀드 시장에 늦게 인식되는 것을 확인하였다. 다음으로, 연금펀드의 설정금액의 측면에서는 일반 펀드에 대한 유리한 세법 개정의 경우에는 설정금액이 감소하는 반면 불리한 세법 개정의 경우에는 설정금액이 증가해서 일반 펀드와 연금펀드 간의 대체적 또는 경쟁적 관계가 존재함을 확인할 수 있었다. 마지막으로, 연금펀드의 환매금액의 측면에서는 투자자의 유동성 제약을 완화시키는 유리한 세법 개정의 경우에는 연금펀드의 환매금액이 증가하는 것을 확인할 수 있다. 본 연구는 선행연구가 부족한 상황에서 연금펀드에 미치는 조세요인의 효과를 실증분석을 통해 확인함으로써 연금저축상품에 대한 세제혜택이 자산운용시장에 미치는 영향을 확인하였다는 점에서 공헌점이 있다.

Abstract

Pension savings funds are subject to the tax incentive policies which is called pension taxation. Contribution deductions within certain limitation are applied in the contribution stage, tax exemptions are applied in the management stage, and low tax rates on the pension income are applied in the payout stage. Furthermore, pension incomes are not subject to financial income composition taxation. Therefore, pension funds could be seen as a comparatively more tax-favorable asset compared to normal funds. Pension savings funds after the tax revisions become comparatively more tax-favorable compared to pension savings funds prior to the revisions if the favorable tax treatments are widened each year following revisions to tax regulations. If these tax factors are considered, it is expected that the rate of return of pension savings funds in the asset management market change significantly owing to implicit tax effects in the case of favorable revisions to tax regulations. Meanwhile, there are differences in their taxation schemes and in application of special taxation between normal funds and pension saving funds. Revisions to tax regulations whereby tax benefits of normal funds are discontinued or bestowed, while not being direct tax benefits to the pension saving fund, influence pension savings funds and meaningfully vary the targeted AUM for pension savings funds. Pension savings funds, while given tax benefits, are financial products that require long-term maintenance periods or pension-type collections. The revisions to tax regulations relating to liquidity easing of pension product funds during the period of analysis are expected to have a significant influence on the variance of fund redemption amounts. With taking account of issues related to taxation on pension saving funds and normal funds, this study seeks to analyze whether tax factors, such as tax incentive policies or the difference in taxation methods for pension savings funds and normal funds, significantly influence investments in pension savings funds, through variances of yield, targeted AUM, and cancellation amounts of pension savings funds. To this end, this study checked investors’ response to tax law revisions in the capital markets, especially in asset management market, where tax-favored assets are traded. The data used in this study are from the software DataGuide from FNGuide Inc., a fund rating company. These data are based on disclosure data from the Korea Financial Investment Association, and contain basic information on individual fund and management companies, such as returns, net assets, management fees, and management methods. Among all the funds provided by DataGuide, the sample for this study is all pension funds with more than 1 year of operating history from January 2004 to June 30, 2015. As results of regression on this study, it is confirmed the significant influence of tax factors on the returns, targeted AUM, and redemption amounts of pension savings funds. First, in the year with favorable revisions to tax regulations on pension savings funds, there were decreases in before-tax returns and generally significant negative coefficients. These results are considered to reflect the implicit tax effects of tax benefits. However, the before-tax variance of 2014, with mixed revisions, and 2015, with favorable revisions, did not match expectations. This indicates that the revisions in these years did not influence the before-tax returns of pension savings funds. Next, it was observed that tax regulation revisions favorable for normal funds caused the targeted AUM for pension savings funds to decrease, and unfavorable tax regulation revisions for normal funds caused the targeted AUM for pension savings funds to increase. Lastly, as expected, the redemption amounts were found to increase following tax regulation revisions that were favorable for easing the liquidity constraints of pension savings funds. The majority of previous studies suggest that because tax factors influence yields, tax factors must be considered in the investors’ decision-making process. These studies focus on markets in which traditional financial assets, such as stocks and bonds, are traded via direct investment, and studies on funds and collective investment vehicles are limited. However, this study is unique in its analysis of diverse tax factors, such as changes in tax incentive policies for pension savings and differences between tax systems for pension savings funds and normal funds, and their influence on pension savings fund markets. It does so by focusing on a pension savings fund market with limited prior studies, and reflecting control variables that can influence fund performance. This analysis is meaningful in its analysis of the influence of tax factors focused on pension savings funds traded in thinly researched asset management markets. It empirically confirms the influence of tax support policies that directly support old-age preparation in asset management markets, and deduces useful policy considerations as a result.

발행기관:
한국회계학회
분류:
회계학

AI 법률 상담

이 논문의 주제에 대해 더 알고 싶으신가요?

460만+ 법률 자료에서 관련 판례·법령·해석례를 찾아 답변합니다

AI 상담 시작
연금펀드에 대한 조세지원 정책이 자본시장에 미치는 영향 | 회계저널 2016 | AskLaw | 애스크로 AI