섭외적 저작권 침해에 관한 비교법적 고찰 - 동경지방재판소 평성26년 7월 16일 판례를 중심으로 -

Nowadays, so many intellectual property dispute are occurred. Besides, these cases are getting complex and diversified. And also, almost cases are occurred in many countries. At this time, we must need to decide the choice of law for international dispute resolution. In other words, above all, to handle the rapidly increasing international intellectual property cases more reasonably and efficiently, not only theoretical establishment but also the provisions of laws on them must have preference over others. However, there are many cases where settlement of them is difficult since legislation of each country to regulate these cases is too diversified. Especially, in the intellectual property dispute such as copyright dispute, there is no clause for choice of laws about the solution of international intellectual property dispute in Japan. But in Korea, there is article 24 in Korean Private international law. Therefore, in some cases, it maybe leads different result by the rule of choice of laws between Korea and Japan. So, the purpose of this study is about the rule of international jurisdiction and choice of laws for the solution of international intellectual property disputes in the point of comparative views.