애스크로AIPublic Preview
← 학술논문 검색
학술논문IT와 법연구2017.02 발행KCI 피인용 7

자율주행자동차(Autonomous Vehicle) 도입을 위한 헌법적 연구

A study on constitutional law for the introduction of autonomous vehicle

최경미(성균관대학교); 지성우(성균관대학교)

14호, 235~276쪽

초록

Autonomous vehicle(AV) is a research topic that needs research in the field of public law. And among them, solving the moral dilemma around the life rights is one of the most important research fields. In this article, the law and the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Korea set out the criteria for the conflict of basic rights of the right to life in matters such as artificial abortion, euthanasia or dignity death, I have tried to analyze it in the light of what it suggests. As a result of the analysis, the following two conclusions were drawn to the dilemma regarding the right to life of autonomous vehicles(AV). First, our Constitution respects self-determination. Therefore, even if a strong artificial intelligence(AI) emerges and transcends human knowledge and judgment, man's autonomy is a prior and natural legal right, so human judgment should always be given precedence. The recent imposition of a 'kill switch' in the EU resolution is in line with my argument that human judgment should prevail. Second, our Constitution, according to the philosophy of Immanuel Kant, treats human beings as a purpose and prohibits human beings as means. Therefore, it should be prohibited to assign differential value to human life or to calculate utilitarian way of thinking and cost benefit in the case of autonomous vehicle (AV), especially in the collision of basic right of life. However, our Constitution permits the application of the principle of proportional exception under Article 37.2 of the Constitution even in the case of the collision of basic right of life. Therefore, it can not be said that utilitarianism is totally excluded from the situation of collateral rights. In the end, defining the norms of collision of life rights in a autonomous vehicle (AV) is not a matter of discovery but of human – centered rational choice and decision through social consensus. This paper also summarizes the issues related to the constitutional right to equality, property rights, and privacy of autonomous vehicles (AV).

Abstract

Autonomous vehicle(AV) is a research topic that needs research in the field of public law. And among them, solving the moral dilemma around the life rights is one of the most important research fields. In this article, the law and the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Korea set out the criteria for the conflict of basic rights of the right to life in matters such as artificial abortion, euthanasia or dignity death, I have tried to analyze it in the light of what it suggests. As a result of the analysis, the following two conclusions were drawn to the dilemma regarding the right to life of autonomous vehicles(AV). First, our Constitution respects self-determination. Therefore, even if a strong artificial intelligence(AI) emerges and transcends human knowledge and judgment, man's autonomy is a prior and natural legal right, so human judgment should always be given precedence. The recent imposition of a 'kill switch' in the EU resolution is in line with my argument that human judgment should prevail. Second, our Constitution, according to the philosophy of Immanuel Kant, treats human beings as a purpose and prohibits human beings as means. Therefore, it should be prohibited to assign differential value to human life or to calculate utilitarian way of thinking and cost benefit in the case of autonomous vehicle (AV), especially in the collision of basic right of life. However, our Constitution permits the application of the principle of proportional exception under Article 37.2 of the Constitution even in the case of the collision of basic right of life. Therefore, it can not be said that utilitarianism is totally excluded from the situation of collateral rights. In the end, defining the norms of collision of life rights in a autonomous vehicle (AV) is not a matter of discovery but of human – centered rational choice and decision through social consensus. This paper also summarizes the issues related to the constitutional right to equality, property rights, and privacy of autonomous vehicles (AV).

발행기관:
IT와 법연구소
DOI:
http://dx.doi.org/10.37877/itnlaw.2017.02.14.7
분류:
기타법학

AI 법률 상담

이 논문의 주제에 대해 더 알고 싶으신가요?

460만+ 법률 자료에서 관련 판례·법령·해석례를 찾아 답변합니다

AI 상담 시작
자율주행자동차(Autonomous Vehicle) 도입을 위한 헌법적 연구 | IT와 법연구 2017 | AskLaw | 애스크로 AI