우리나라 주택정책의 변천과정에 있어서 파생된 문제점 및 보완사항

The problem of the change of housing policy in Korea is raised as follows. Due to the lack of housing policy and the incompatibility, the original plan of the government of Rhee Seung-man was not realized due to the situation of the times and poor financial condition. Park Jeong - hee’s government tended to depend on the private sector due to the poor finances during the 5 - year economic development plan, especially in the 1970’s, the rapid development of the national economy led to a rise in land prices, real estate speculation, as the urban population soared, housing problems became more serious, the government tried various regulations and support policies for the low - income group, but the lack of policy and the lack of enforcement were pointed out. Chun Doo-hwan led the government's initiative to expand housing supply in accordance with the five-year plan for economic development, but the adverse effects of rising housing prices and speculation led to changes in various regulations and economic stimulus policies. However the Roh Tae-woo government attempted to double-face its policy by restraining speculation and providing measures to revitalize the housing market, but it was not a fundamental measure. Kim Young-sam government's initial real-name financial system and real estate realization system have kept home prices and land prices relatively stable, but domestic conditions and real estate transactions have shrunk and housing prices have fallen due to the IMF. The Kim Dae-jung government announced a series of measures to revitalize the housing business, including housing tax cuts and housing purchase funding, in order to cope with the overall recession caused by the IMF and to stimulate demand and supply of housing, however, excessive deregulation did not fundamentally cure housing problems. The Roh Moo-hyun government also attempted various regulations and supply expansion policies due to the rise of house prices in the Seoul metropolitan area and the spread of speculation throughout the country due to the announcement of large-scale projects, eventually short-term policy only resulted in confusion. The Lee Myung-bak administration attempted to deregulate various dwellings due to the over-supply of local apartments and to provide sheltered housing to stabilize ordinary residents but there was no real effect in meeting the real problem. The Park Keun Hae government has attempted various support policies due to the decline of the initial house prices and the high rate of lease deposit money, In particular, the government has been constructing and providing happy houses for the stabilization of ordinary residents, but it faces realistic difficulties. In this regard, the followings are suggested as supplementary items on the problems of each government 's housing policy. As for the housing problems of the Rhee Seung-man government, it is necessary to have a strong will to secure adequate financial capacity and to realize the government's aggressive policies in advance. Park Jeong-hee's housing policy was neglected due to the economic development plan, and since the 1970s economy developed and the housing problem became socialized, the government did not provide much help in resolving the fundamental housing problem with the post-war drugstore coping so government-led intent and control for precise planning and implementation were needed . The housing policy of Chun Doo-hwan expanded the supply of housing according to the 5-year plan of economic development, but land prices and speculation were rampant, and tax policy and support policy for low - income class were tried. Therefore, in order to facilitate the housing policy, it is important to actively try to solve the problems beforehand and solve the problems. Roh Tae-woo 's government also tried to double - sided policies by revitalizing the housing market and restricting speculation. First of all, for the housing policy to revitalize the economy, we should not make mistakes by considering the pre-estimated forecast and policy enforcement based on the experience of the previous government, especially the housing policy for the low - income class needs to be prepared in advance. The Real-name system of real estate in Kim Young-sam government made real estate transactions relatively stable, but the real estate prices was plunged due to domestic and foreign influences. This is also a continuation of the regulation and mitigation of the housing policy of the government. Therefore, it is necessary to establish and implement the policy in a longer-term perspective and propose a fundamental solution. The Kim Dae-jung government has tried to support the IMF and stimulate the economy by stimulating demand and supply of housing and promoting transactions, but it is estimated that there was no effect. In the end, it is important to fix the housing problem in a more fundamental and long-term perspective, to secure the credibility of the policy, and to resolve the gap with reality. As the Roh Moo-hyun government announced a large-scale development project, resulting in rising house prices and a boom in development throughout the country, the various regulations have been strengthened by anti-speculation measures. In other words, the government tried to take a leading role in the housing policy but it was assessed as a temporary effect and not so effective, so it is also necessary to strategically manage the housing policy in the long run. The Lee Myung Bak government attempted various deregulation policies in response to tax cuts on unsold housing units due to oversupply of apartments in the early days of the government and the real estate market decline due to the global financial crisis, in order to stabilize the nest housing of ordinary people, the government has attempted to expand the housing supply and to reduce the burden on the households, particularly a more realistic approach is needed for the housing policy. The government tried to mitigate and support various taxes and regulations due to the shrinkage of transactions due to the decline of the initial house prices and the surge in the pre-set prices. Especially, it is not realistic about the provision of happy houses, so it is considered that more realistic and consistent policy enforcement and long-term management are needed.