부동산중개업과 변호사의 직무범위

This issue raises the question of what the relationship is between the concept of ‘legal services’ for the purpose of Paragraph 1 of Article 109 of Attorney-at-Law Act, ‘material detailing the cases that has been accepted’ for the purpose of Paragraph 1 of Article 89-4 of the act and the concept of ‘case’, ‘accepted case’ that are repeatedly used throughout the Attorney-at-Law Act. From a structural point of view, it would be fair to say that a ripe case is not necessary for ‘legal case’ or ‘legal service’ to develop. The Attorney-at-Law Act uses terms such as ‘case’, ‘accepted case’ with regards to ripe cases. The business of practicing licensed real estate agent and that of attorneys-at-law are very different. The former focuses on Licensed Real Estate Agents Act, which are assist and mediate so that legal acts such as transactions between the parties can be done easily. Thus they are regarded as de facto acts by the precedents and accepted theories. Meanwhile, attorney-at-law represent their clients in suit-related acts and claims for administrative measures and handle general legal affairs. The problem is that both practicing licensed real estate agent and attorney-at-law try to expand their business areas for various reasons including service expanding, in which case a clash is inevitable between their business areas. This study reviewed the attorneys in the “ Real Easte Trust” are neither professionally nor legally certified real estate agents, they are doing the real estate business using a similar name title that an ordinary real estate agency uses, Using such a similar name gets into troubles with the law