동반성장지수 평가체계 모형의 타당성 검증 및 개선방안: 대기업 수용성과 규제개혁의 조화

The purpose of this article is to verify the validity of Win-Win Index evaluation system model and recommend its remedies focusing on the acceptability of large enterprises and reconciliation of regulatory reform. Since 2011, the model has been annually being applied to Win-Win Index evaluation by the KCCP. The research model has consisted of four independent variables(evaluation factors) with their observable variables and one dependent variable(level). The findings of multiple-regression analysis are as follows. Firstly, ‘fairness and validity of agreement fulfillment(TCP) process’, ‘appropriateness of win-win cooperation support agreement’s terms’, ‘prevention and system construction against law violation’, ‘appropriateness of contract fairness agreement fulfillment terms of pre-revision(before 2016.2) of win-win model’, ‘appropriateness of sensory survey method of the Korea Commission for Corporate Partnership(KCCP)’, and ‘appropriateness of agreement fulfillment terms on the law violation prevention and law compliance effort’ have positively affected the win-win level(index). Secondly, ‘fairness and validity of contract fulfillment process’, ‘appropriateness of contract fairness agreement fulfillment terms of post-revision (after 2016.2) of win-win model’, and ‘post-monitoring system construction of law violation’ have negatively affected the win-win level(index). Finally, several remedies of current Win-Win Index evaluation system model are recommended to reflect the current realistic Win-Win Growth level along with acceptability of large enterprises & reconciliation of regulatory reform including the introduction of sensory survey method by the mixture of both quantitative and qualitative evaluations.